Shooting Practice: The Anti-American Dance (1)
From the desk of Paul Belien on Fri, 2005-09-09 16:59
Andreas Renner, the Christian-Democrat minister of Social Affairs in the German state of Baden-Wuertemberg, wants George W. Bush to be “shot down” for his handling of the crisis in New Orleans. Herr Renner is opposed to the death penalty but would obviously make an exception for the American President. He later retracted the remark (thus admitting that he had shot himself in the foot), explaining he meant Bush should be “shot in a political sense.”
It is strange to find a German so-called “conservative” politician in the company of Norwegian rappers. In October 2004 the Norwegian rap group “Gatas Parlament” called for the murder of Bush. Through the website KillHim.nu they collected money to pay a killer to shoot Bush. “Shooting this man is not just self defense, but is the only reasonable thing to do,” the rappers said. When the American embassy in Oslo complained with the Norwegian authorities, the latter closed down the website. The rappers said their call for Bush’s assassination was “satire,” and then released the video “Antiamerikansk dans” (Anti-American Dance) in which they called for burning American flags and burning down the American embassy. The video can be viewed here.
According to Norwegian law, the rappers risked up to two years in jail for the threats. However, last March the Norwegian police closed the investigation as the American embassy had decided not to press charges. This was announced on al-Jazeera, conveying the message to Muslims worldwide that one is allowed to say whatever one likes about Americans, provided one does it as “satire” or in song.
Today, the “Gatas Parlament” website has the group’s political platform for the general elections on 12 September. One of its demands is to “cast the USA out of Norway.” This is also the demand of the Socialist Left Party, one of Norway’s likely future coalition partners.
In Germany, Socialist politicians are currently demanding Herr Renner’s resignation (or, as he would put it, they want him “shot in a political sense”). The Socialists are seeking revenge for an incident which occurred during the previous election campaign in 2002 when Herta Däubler-Gmelin, the Socialist minister of Justice in the federal government, had to resign after comparing Bush to Hitler.
Meanwhile, the German Socialists have problems with a music group of their own – no rappers but punks. A left-wing punk group has established a political party, the German Anarchist Pogo Party (APPD). Since the APPD has enough members (about 750) and a “party program,” it can participate in the general elections on 18 September. The “party” made a vulgar TV commercial featuring drunk fat men cavorting with equally drunk fat bare-breasted women, raucous partying, scenes featuring needles, rats and spiders, all set to a frantic heavy metal soundtrack. Under German law, the commercial, which can be seen here and here had to be aired by German public television. The networks tried to ban it, but were ordered to air by the courts.
The commercial, which preceded a popular television show on prime time, has outraged many German television viewers. This prompted Otto Schily, the Socialist minister of the Interior in the federal government, to ask why the group, which he called a “disgrace for Germany,” had not been banned from standing for election. The question is who is the biggest disgrace for Germany: the Christian-Democrat Andreas Renner, the Pogo Party, or perhaps the German Socialists?
We The People
Submitted by Molly (not verified) on Thu, 2005-09-15 19:25.
'We' are the majority who chose to re-elect him for another 4 years; and only a fool would put any faith in opinion polls. If you look at a conservative poll, you find one result, and a different result with a liberal poll. They change daily and mean nothing.
You like so many others here in Europe seem to infer that Bush is doing a poor job compared to Clinton. The following is from O’Reilly's report yesterday and contradicts everything that the European press has been reporting on Bush’s treatment of the poor. These figures are real!!!
‘Massive neglect? Let's take a look at that bit of overstatement. Halfway through President Clinton's tenure in office in 1996, the poverty rate was 13.7 percent. Halfway through President Bush's tenure, the rate is 12.7 percent, a full point lower.
In 1996, the Clinton budget allotted $191 billion for poverty entitlements. That was 12.2 percent of the budget and a whopping amount of money. That's why Bill Clinton was called the first black president by some.
However, the Bush 2006 budget allots a record shattering $368 billion for poverty entitlements, 14.6 percent of the entire budget, a huge increase over Clinton's spending on poverty entitlements.’
Idiot Renner
Submitted by Molly (not verified) on Tue, 2005-09-13 22:11.
Idiot Renner should take a course in American government before he starts blabbing. The initial responsibility of Katrina started with the city government, then the state, and lastly the federal government.
Mayor Nagil (Democrat) left scores of buses sitting that could and should have been used to ferry the people without cars out of harm's way, then 30% of the N.O. police force fled. N.O. is notorious for having corrupt law enforcement and the city was well on it's way to becoming a murder capital. Nagil had a documented emergency plan that HE did not follow. The governor (Democrat) waited an additional 24 hours to request help from the other state's National Guard troops.
My sis lives in Gulfport, Mississippi and they have not had the horrible impact of the hurricane as in Louisiana. Difference is that the governor (Republican) followed his state's plan.
I suppose idiot Renner believes that hurricane Katrina was also Bush's fault and/or caused by global warming. Then answer me this: The worst storm in the United State's history was in 1900 and hit Galveston, Texas. Approximately 8,000 people died. Bush's fault also?????? Duh.
I would think that Renner and all the other elitists in Europe like him would have enough problems within their own countries. Europe may as well accept the fact that Bush was re-elected. We like him and really don’t care if Germany, Belgium, France or others like our leader or not. In fact, I think it is a hoot that they care so much. I sincerely hope that they are not under the delusion that Americans sit around, worrying, wringing their hands, and criticizing the leaders of Europe. We don’t care!
I'm not bothered. Do you think I'm bothered?
Submitted by Bob Doney on Wed, 2005-09-14 09:46.
Europe may as well accept the fact that Bush was re-elected. We like him and really don’t care if Germany, Belgium, France or others like our leader or not. In fact, I think it is a hoot that they care so much. I sincerely hope that they are not under the delusion that Americans sit around, worrying, wringing their hands, and criticizing the leaders of Europe. We don’t care!
Methinks Molly protesteth too much. Who are the "we" who like Mr Bush? Certainly not the ones answering the opinion polls, where his rankings for competence are sinking sinking sinking. I happen to think Mr Bush has a lot of good qualities, but having a firm grip on the levers of power ain't one of them.
How's your public finances deficit, Molly? Still coming along nicely? George sure knows how to spend money. I hope y'all think you're getting value for money, because it's sure going to take a long time to pay it off.
Bob Doney