Cartoon Rage: Vikings Warned to Leave Palestine
From the desk of Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson on Mon, 2006-01-30 15:08
This morning armed Palestinians stormed the European Union office in Gaza City, threatening Danes and Norwegians and demanding that they leave. Two Norwegian aid workers are on their way out of the region. The Norwegian Foreign Ministry has warned Norwegian citizens against travelling to Gaza. The Danish Foreign Ministry warned Danes to be extremely cautious while travelling in the Middle East and North Africa. Yesterday the Danish national flag was burned in the West Bank in protest against the publication of 12 cartoons of Muhammad (see them all here, halfway the article) in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten last September. Depicting the prophet is blasphemy according to Islam.
The Palestinian terrorist organization Islamic Jihad announced yesterday that all Nordic people had 48 hours to leave Gaza. The al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades distributed leaflets saying that Danes and Swedes had three days to get out of the region. Sweden, however, unlike Denmark and Norway, has nothing to do with the cartoon affair. Perhaps the Norwegians have been omitted by the al-Aqsa Brigades because its leftist government parties have called for a boycott of Israel.
There are also reports that a terrorist group called the Glory Brigades of Northern Europe is threatening suicide attacks in Denmark. Meanwhile the internet edition of Jyllands-Posten was offline for several hours today, and also yesterday and on Friday, due to attacks by computer hackers.
Governments of a number of Muslim countries in the Middle East, such as Jordan
and Syria, have contacted Danish ambassadors and condemned the cartoons. Last week the Jordanian parliament called for the punishment of the Danish cartoonists. On Saturday the Foreign Minister of Iran, Manouchehr Mottaki, wrote to his colleagues in Denmark and Norway protesting the „ridiculous and repulsive insult“ which he says the cartoons embody. Last week Saudi Arabia called back its ambassador to Denmark for consultation. Yesterday Libya decided to close its embassy in Copenhagen in protest against the cartoons and the lack of „responsible actions“ by the Danish government. Libya also said it would be taking “economic measures” against Denmark, but did not say what they would be.
Yesterday the editor of Jyllands-Posten wrote an open letter to the people of Saudi Arabia to justify the publishing of the Muhammad cartoons after a number of Danish export companies with interests in the Middle East had urged him to do so. Several Muslim governments have encouraged their people to boycott Danish products in protest against the cartoons. Disinformation about the affair and about Denmark’s role is being distributed in many Muslim countries, for example through e-mails and sms messages which claim that Jyllands-Posten is a government owned newspaper and that the Danish government was behind the publication of the cartoons. Danish embassies in Arab countries have felt compelled to correct these lies. [There is also disinformation in the Western mainstream media who have finally picked up the story.]
At a press conference in Jeddah on Saturday the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) lambasted the Danish government „over its lack of action or apology“ for the Muhammad cartoons. “The Danish authorities have, by providing protection to the newspaper and failure to censor it in unequivocal terms, served neither the cause of freedom of expression nor advanced the goals of multiculturalism, domestically or internationally. The Danish authorities should have categorically condemned the cartoons,” said Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, Secretary-general of the OIC.
Ihsanoglu added that the “failure” of the Danish authorities to condemn the cartoons sets a dangerous precedent. He welcomed diplomatic actions from Muslim countries against Denmark and said that the anger against the country is reflected in the boycott of Danish goods. “If they have the freedom of expression, then individual Muslims have the freedom of choice,” he said. Ihsanoglu nevertheless acknowledged the conflicting issues of press freedom and respect for other religions, but said Danish authorities “had a responsibility to control such material which incited hatred and religious intolerance.” Previously the OIC urged Muslims to protest in a peaceful manner.
In addition the OIC and the Arab League have announced their intention to appeal to the United Nations’ General Assembly to issue a resolution “prohibiting attacks on religion.” Such a resolution would among other things make it possible to resort to economic sanctions against countries that contravene it.
Both José Manuel Barroso, the president of the EU Commission, and the Austrian chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel, who currently holds the EU precidency, appear to be avoiding discussions on the cartoon affair. At a press conference in Salzburg on Friday Barroso claimed he did not really know in detail what the issue is about and was obviously not too pleased at being asked to comment on the it. Barroso said furthermore that the EU supported freedom of expression but not necessarily everything which is expressed. The Danish Foreign Minister, Per Stig Møller, has said he intends to bring the issue up for discussion at today’s meeting of EU Foreign Ministers, mainly to inform his colleagues about the situation and the postion of the Danish government.
Though under huge pressure to intervene, the Danish government still stands firmly by its previous statements that it cannot and will not interfere in what the Danish press decides to publish. At his weekly press meeting last Tuesday Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Denmark need not be ashamed of its handling of human rights in the cartoon affair and referred to a reply from his government to an enquiry from the UN about the issue two months ago.
In a new poll published in Denmark last week 79% of Danes say the Danish government should not apologize for the cartoons while 18% say it should. 62% say Jyllands-Posten should not apologize, but 31% say it should. 58% say the newspaper had every right to publish the cartoons, but also said they understood Muslims were angry. 579 people were polled.
guess they won't take the
Submitted by Lode Runner on Thu, 2006-02-09 02:55.
guess they won't take the veil off.
Aman,
Submitted by plateau on Wed, 2006-02-08 23:42.
Fine you find us offensive and our behaviour ugly and odd. You have every right but rest assured the feeling is utterly mutual in this regard. Just don't go immigrating to one of our filfthy, decadent countries ok?
As to the war in Iraq I opposed it, I oppose it still because the reasons were trumped and spurious, because it would only feed the rabid, extremist elements in the Muslim world who seem incapable of facing the problems with their own governments and societies and instead conveniently blame their inadequacies on the west, and I want the people of Iraq to achieve democracy, freedom, and Enlightenment by themselves - the hard way as it was done in the West.
The Iraq war let you guys off the hook - instead of facing your own problems you have a convenient scapegoat.
I don't want to see anymore dying anywhere. As a secular humanist, I might find your religion and beliefs abhorrent but I don't want to see innocent people on all sides hurt or killed. So in the spirit of opposing bloodshed how about you denounce here those who kill and threaten to kill in the name os islam?
patriot and plateau
Submitted by Aman on Wed, 2006-02-08 23:27.
I do not care about you, or your way of life at all, but its funny that you are who interfere with our way of life.
I'm not offended by those naked people, because its their dirty problem, but this is the image of your people from my point of view, it's my freedom isn't it?
you know what the difference between our societies?
we have some odd people or those who trying to do just like you, but we do not celebrate the ugly and the odd behavior; while you do celebrate every dirty action in the name of freedom, and that make dirty things to spread in your society while it's very limited in ours.
our women are treated in a good way " in most of the places in the Islamic world " , but you are the people who treat women as animal, you just care about their bodies, and you would see a naked women on every kind of advertisements, so you use them even to sell an insecticide, if not worse.
I do not hate anybody, but yes I do hate the dirty deeds and any occupation force
So you hate a society that
Submitted by Lode Runner on Thu, 2006-02-09 02:03.
So you hate a society that has women in strip bars and degredates women. You also hate the same society that allows women to work and feed their children once their husbands are dead. This was a problem in Afghanistan, where Muslim women were killed for working to feed their children. You seem to place execution above rituals. I submit that women in the western world love their freedom. Thay can choose to be friends with anyone. Sure, there are problems, but we don't keep them locked up where nobody sees their faces. Do you honestly think women like that, or do you view women as a farmer views his animals?
Hypocracy or Hate?
Submitted by Lode Runner on Thu, 2006-02-09 02:19.
Hate posting a comment twice- but my first never made it. How is it that even moderate Muslims can come out in droves to protest cartoons, yet none cam out after 9/11 when two thousand people were killed, many of them Muslims. Two scenarios possible- (1) Moderates afraid of reprucussions from the fanatics, or (2) Moderates silently cheering the fanatics on. Either scenario is chilling, and should tell all who has the REAL power in the Muslim world. So, you can all guess what will happen if these nations get a nuke.
response to aman
Submitted by Patriot on Wed, 2006-02-08 23:42.
There wouldn't be an occupation force had the muslim world taken care of its fundamentalists. You see, its very simple, for every action there is an opposite and equal reaction. The world trade center bombings were the last straws, so we decided to set up shop in the middle east just as we set up shop in Europe and Asia after WWII. If you want to blame someone or something blame yourself and the terrorist groups which you support.
Addendum
Submitted by plateau on Wed, 2006-02-08 23:11.
AS an addendum - a mature society looks at the problems it's faces and openly discusses them. In the main, that's what western societies do. It's about time the muslim world leanrt how to introspect. To look at it and the problems it has. There is a veil of secrecy and issues in your societies that you dare not touch for fear of losing face.
Meanwhile people are abused and oppressed, and have no voice.
So you are better than us? I think not.
http://hrw.org/mideast/saudi/labor/
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/12/21/morocc12278.htm
http://hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/iran1205/
http://wwwc.house.gov/international_relations/109/mal111505.pdf
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/11/21/iran12072.htm
I could go on. But Aman, if you want to live in your prison of oppression and secrecy, be my guest. Meanwhile, the problems we have, we'll attempt to address as a society.
You Aman
Submitted by plateau on Wed, 2006-02-08 22:57.
Aman, you might want to remove the log from your own eye before pointing at the splinter in ours (I'm sure you;re familiar with that one).
The thing is, western societies in the main, openly discuss social problems such as teenage pregnancy, drug abuse and rape in their socieities. Statistics are compiled. Do you seriously think rape, abuse, and molestation don't occur in the muslim world? There's been but it's a taboo to intrude into the private lives of people, behind closed doors where all kinds of abuse no doubt takes place. We just have the decency to face up to it, you in your hypocrisy do not. http://www.muslimarights.org/issues.htm and http://www.wae.org/islam/muslim-women.htm
As to nudity or beachwear. We don't find it offensive so the problem is your's, not ours. So if you ever come to a western country you have to respect that we reagard these things differently as you just as a western women would be expected to dress appropriately when visiting a muslim country.
And as to gays. So what? Better two people who love each other than your arranged marriages and forced submission.
So much for the being a religion of peace and love when you hold so much hate and prejudice for others.
you halleluya
Submitted by Aman on Wed, 2006-02-08 22:46.
We are much better than you halleluya, look how nice is your society with those who always drunk like animals and stinky with their smelly mouths ,or those mad people who stop you in the street to tell you stupid things, or those pregnant teenagers, or those who sit naked as devils on beaches , or read about the horrible number of rape crimes, children abuse, gay marriage , and that new disgusting trio marriage, and many many awful things
What a virtues
I see you world is the civilized world !
Submitted by Balder on Thu, 2006-02-09 02:12.
Wasn't it child abuse when the warlord Muhammed took the virginity of his 9 year old wife ?
Q) What will happend if a girl/child i raped in a Muslim state like Pakistan ?
A) The victim will be stoned to death !
Are a person a devil if he/she is naked ?
Where I live most rapes, espically group rapes are done by persons from the Middle East !