Cartoon Rage: Vikings Warned to Leave Palestine

This morning armed Palestinians stormed the European Union office in Gaza City, threatening Danes and Norwegians and demanding that they leave. Two Norwegian aid workers are on their way out of the region. The Norwegian Foreign Ministry has warned Norwegian citizens against travelling to Gaza. The Danish Foreign Ministry warned Danes to be extremely cautious while travelling in the Middle East and North Africa. Yesterday the Danish national flag was burned in the West Bank in protest against the publication of 12 cartoons of Muhammad (see them all here, halfway the article) in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten last September. Depicting the prophet is blasphemy according to Islam.

The Palestinian terrorist organization Islamic Jihad announced yesterday that all Nordic people had 48 hours to leave Gaza. The al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades distributed leaflets saying that Danes and Swedes had three days to get out of the region. Sweden, however, unlike Denmark and Norway, has nothing to do with the cartoon affair. Perhaps the Norwegians have been omitted by the al-Aqsa Brigades because its leftist government parties have called for a boycott of Israel.

There are also reports that a terrorist group called the Glory Brigades of Northern Europe is threatening suicide attacks in Denmark. Meanwhile the internet edition of Jyllands-Posten was offline for several hours today, and also yesterday and on Friday, due to attacks by computer hackers.

Governments of a number of Muslim countries in the Middle East, such as Jordan
and Syria, have contacted Danish ambassadors and condemned the cartoons. Last week the Jordanian parliament called for the punishment of the Danish cartoonists. On Saturday the Foreign Minister of Iran, Manouchehr Mottaki, wrote to his colleagues in Denmark and Norway protesting the „ridiculous and repulsive insult“ which he says the cartoons embody. Last week Saudi Arabia called back its ambassador to Denmark for consultation. Yesterday Libya decided to close its embassy in Copenhagen in protest against the cartoons and the lack of „responsible actions“ by the Danish government. Libya also said it would be taking “economic measures” against Denmark, but did not say what they would be.

Yesterday the editor of Jyllands-Posten wrote an open letter to the people of Saudi Arabia to justify the publishing of the Muhammad cartoons after a number of Danish export companies with interests in the Middle East had urged him to do so. Several Muslim governments have encouraged their people to boycott Danish products in protest against the cartoons. Disinformation about the affair and about Denmark’s role is being distributed in many Muslim countries, for example through e-mails and sms messages which claim that Jyllands-Posten is a government owned newspaper and that the Danish government was behind the publication of the cartoons. Danish embassies in Arab countries have felt compelled to correct these lies. [There is also disinformation in the Western mainstream media who have finally picked up the story.]

At a press conference in Jeddah on Saturday the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) lambasted the Danish government „over its lack of action or apology“ for the Muhammad cartoons. “The Danish authorities have, by providing protection to the newspaper and failure to censor it in unequivocal terms, served neither the cause of freedom of expression nor advanced the goals of multiculturalism, domestically or internationally. The Danish authorities should have categorically condemned the cartoons,” said Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, Secretary-general of the OIC.

Ihsanoglu added that the “failure” of the Danish authorities to condemn the cartoons sets a dangerous precedent. He welcomed diplomatic actions from Muslim countries against Denmark and said that the anger against the country is reflected in the boycott of Danish goods. “If they have the freedom of expression, then individual Muslims have the freedom of choice,” he said. Ihsanoglu nevertheless acknowledged the conflicting issues of press freedom and respect for other religions, but said Danish authorities “had a responsibility to control such material which incited hatred and religious intolerance.” Previously the OIC urged Muslims to protest in a peaceful manner.

In addition the OIC and the Arab League have announced their intention to appeal to the United Nations’ General Assembly to issue a resolution “prohibiting attacks on religion.” Such a resolution would among other things make it possible to resort to economic sanctions against countries that contravene it.

Both José Manuel Barroso, the president of the EU Commission, and the Austrian chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel, who currently holds the EU precidency, appear to be avoiding discussions on the cartoon affair. At a press conference in Salzburg on Friday Barroso claimed he did not really know in detail what the issue is about and was obviously not too pleased at being asked to comment on the it. Barroso said furthermore that the EU supported freedom of expression but not necessarily everything which is expressed. The Danish Foreign Minister, Per Stig Møller, has said he intends to bring the issue up for discussion at today’s meeting of EU Foreign Ministers, mainly to inform his colleagues about the situation and the postion of the Danish government.

Though under huge pressure to intervene, the Danish government still stands firmly by its previous statements that it cannot and will not interfere in what the Danish press decides to publish. At his weekly press meeting last Tuesday Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Denmark need not be ashamed of its handling of human rights in the cartoon affair and referred to a reply from his government to an enquiry from the UN about the issue two months ago.

In a new poll published in Denmark last week 79% of Danes say the Danish government should not apologize for the cartoons while 18% say it should. 62% say Jyllands-Posten should not apologize, but 31% say it should. 58% say the newspaper had every right to publish the cartoons, but also said they understood Muslims were angry. 579 people were polled.

More on the Cartoon Case (see links at end of article)

not objecting nor supportive

umm.. people.. look, i know that what they did were extreme, but that doesnt mean we have to show them we're also idiots. sure, some of them are but i think both sides are just acting stupid! the freedom of speech thing doesnt apply to every country and burning and attacking is soo not muslim..

They should come up with a resolution..
1. religiously insulting cartoons may be sensitive so it should just be published discreetly (not in a national newspaper)
2. muslims should stop attacking and burning

to Loser # 43

i have just turned on the ignore button towards you.  and yeah by the way why dont you try coming and saying all this stuff in my face.  ur probably a 4 foot 5 inch small piece of dung.  come mess with me 6 feet. 185 pounds. and i'll show you a thing or two. neways. this is the last message for hopeless losers. 

To Imran Patel

Well if you are afraid he is too small ..What about me. I am a female, but I think..no I know I can kick your arse! My last discussion with my muslim arab ex.. I kicked his arse too!
and the muslim beotch he was sleeping in my bed with. * hah all the furniture in the house was mine anyway* So bring it on.. You are bad. Then I promise to do a good souix scalping of your tired arse.

By the way I stand a 6 feet also and I can handle your bum.. Also I am a sharpshooter markswoman! Should be interesting. And Father trained me for hand to hand combat. Make my day!
Raghead!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

To Muslim

I totally agree with you....the ignorant people will never succeed in life.  It the people who are willing to listen we must speak with cause they are the only ones who truly deserve to be saved from the fires of hell.  As for the rest we pray for that they may one day be lead to the correct path.Insha-Allah.

Allahu-Akbar

To Balder

The Prophet Muhammed(P.B.U.H) did not take the virginity of Aisha(his wife) when she was 9.  He did not even wed her at that age.  He was engaged to her.  Meaning he was to look after her from now on.  How are you sure he took her virginity.  You know nothing.  You people must do your research first please.  I just dunno how arrogant you fools can be.  Also, armyscout43 is just a dumbass who is trying to get some attention.  Please when people are doing some serious and important talk. Dont shove your damn nose in.  And if you want to. Say sumthing worthwhile.  I dont want to hear no Stargate or Star Wars shit.  And by the way in Stargate the reason it was the west saved the world is cause its a movie made by people in the west.  Think before you say sumthing.  Your just proving you have no brain. And if you do, you lack the sensibility to use it.  Atleast the others here are using it. 

To "Imran Patel"

Please don't waste your time with armyscout. Let's focus on discussing issues with people who know their facts, and who have a normal level of tolerance. I mean, how are you going to convince someone who thinks there are no Muslims living in China that there are millions of Chinese Uighur Muslims in western China? Imam Shafi'i said that in a debate between a person of knowledge and an igornamus, the ignoramus will always win.

What you mean is as long as

What you mean is as long as westerners are kyssing muslim tail then they are good little westerners but if they tell you to shut up or back up, then we are bad little westerners. Okej! How about this! Get stuffed!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Newt Gingrich criticized the White House on FoxNews Yesterday.

Newt Gingrich on FoxNews Yesterday said something to the effect of, "We should stand with the free people of the world and not bow down to fascist regimes."

(For the benefit of those who don't know, Newt Gingrich was the Republican leader of the US House of Representatives who, in 1994, lead the Republicans to their first majority in the US House of Representatives since 1948.)

In my own words, the White House is trying to achieve "Peace in our time" by coming down on the side of censorship and repression. What else do we have to give up to appease Muslim "sensibilities". Muslims celebrate when we're attacked and they are unhappy when we succeed. Why are we coddling people who hate us and what we stand for?

Don't get me wrong, I am not advocating for another war, but lets be honest with them and say we don't agree and we won't tolerate violence against our citizens exercising their rights under our constitutions and laws.

To 'Another American'

No, all Muslims don't rejoice when Americans are attacked.

And don't forget that the US Republican government itself has strong ties with Islamo-fascists like Saudi Arabia, not to mention brutal dictators like Islam Karimov.

72? virgins?

How cute are these virgins if they lived out their natural lives without finding a mate?