I can't understand why some of the people who posted above should even be concerned about being called racists or anti-PC. Wasn't it in Sweden that an "Imam" put his "nihil obstat" on the rape of Swedish women by calling them whores who deserved to be raped? If this isn't racism I don't know what is. We've fallen for the dogma that the word "racist" is a word that may be applied only to Caucasians.

IN Philadelphia a "Black Panther" (an insult to the feline community) stood on South Street (a kind of 'trendy" area in Philly and called passing White women whores and advising other Blacks that they only way they'll be free is by "killing the crackers and killing their little babies". This demonic bastard was one of the two who stood outside a polling place and threatened potential White voters on the Presidential election day.

The US Attorney General Eric Holder decided that he would not prosecute the "Panthers" for voter intimidation and apparently it was OK for a Black to exhort other Blacks to kill White people.

We're also experiencing an epidemic of Black teenage mob attacks against White people in cities and towns all over the US. There were almost no reports of the victims trying to defend themselves. We've been so indoctrinated with PC that we're afraid to fight back because of the fear of being labeled. The White male is a mere shadow of his former self. He's lost his "huevos" and has no desire to rediscover them. He won't even defend his women. Of course Blacks are violent and volatile with absolutely no impulse control and will attack for no apparent reason and that makes them fearsome. Most victims feel that it's better to take a full force punch to the face, to fall and then be repeatedly kicked in head than to risk being killed. That was what the poor young man who was beaten and kicked to death on the Philadelphia subway platform must have been thinking.

What happened to the White Europeans and Americans who defeated the Nazis? 

We've got to throw off the mantle of PC and begin to fight back. Stop feeding the diversity crocodile because he's going to eat you whenever he wants.

If I may interfere with your little discussion (or should I write dispute) with Marcfrans, I don’t believe there is evidence that shows that the treatment in Guantanamo   did “create” more terrorists. Nor do I think a harsh treatment of Anders would result in more violence from the extreme right. I think Marcfrans has a point there. But then he is talking about the consequences in the short run, ignoring those in the long. In the long run, walking the thin divide between “harsh treatment” and “torture”, is extremely dangerous and unwise. There are some exceptions of course. If somebody has put a bomb somewhere that is about to go off, I think you’re in titled to do what ever you want to get the information out of him to prevent the massacre.  But harsh treatment as deterrence is absolutely unwise. It erodes the fundamentals of the civilization we’re defending. It causes blurring of the moral standards we’re fighting for in the first place.     

A little advice concerning Marcfrans. Don’t get too irritated because of his stile. If you can ignore the slightly insulting parts you will find that the content is mostly worth reading. He is the one who made me come to this website in the first place. He is one of the few that comes with real arguments that might shed a new light, rather than the endless repeating dogmas of most of the other contributors.         

@antiburreaucratic

Where on earth do you get this rubbish from??
NO one has ever been waterboarded at Gitmo, NONE of the military guards there has ever shot at any prisoners. Despite what the leftist international red cross and other leftist humanitarian agencies say the prisoners are treated better there than in any 3rd world prison and most probably then in any EU prison. I served there for 2 years in the State Dept. under GWB and know many colleagues who have served there before and after me for first hand information rather than the leftist disinformation society where you apparently get your disinformation.

@ coddeau

Could you please clarify your comment, or otherwise be silent.  Who do you disagree with and what do you disagree about? 

If you disagree with the author of the article, Ms West, what kind of "behaviour" are you referring to?

If your disagreement is with 'Antibureaucratic', could you please make an effort to answer the following simple questions:

- How could 'harsh treatment' of terrorists undermine...."the belief in a civilised democractic society"...?  Your assertion does not make any sense.  It is precisely the lack of harsh treatment of terrorists that undermines that "belief".    It is hard to "belief" in any democratic society that is either (a) incapable of defending itself effectively against terrorists or (b) that treats terrorism 'lightly'. 

- How could harsh treatment of terrorists "push" marginalised people over the edge?  Your claim is absurd.  A 'domestic terrorist', like Breivik, does NOT engage in terrorism because foreign terrorists might be treated harshly by a 'democracy'. If anything, the opposite is more likely to be true.  And a "marginalised" person is not more likely to engage in senseless terrorism because he can expect harsh treatment. 

So it would seem that you are simply parroting pc-dogmas.    

I believe in Norway they are proposing a maximum of 21 years sentence for this misguided monster. I believe he has admitted to having conspired with others. I believe he should be treated as a terrorist, and sent to Guantanamo Bay for the full treatment - waterboarding etc etc. I would like to see how he feels if soldiers occassionally feel the urge to take potshots at his feet or above his head (oops, one might miss and shoot his little toe off). Does this sound harsh? I don't care.

A lot of things are very good in Norway, and a few very important things are so bad that they should scare you thoroghly.  

The madman's actions has set back our struggle to be able to adress migration problems without being labeld nazi or racist.  The push we had on sharia elements being enforced in municipalities are now basically labelled 'antiproductive'.  We're appoaching the former East German mode of operation :  "If you speak on the internet not in accordance with what we deem decent you are sick".

Well, the issues are the same.  They don't have to be labelled Islamic.  If someone wants to supress women that's against most laws in Europe.  Aint'it?  Same goes for freedom to whom you want to marry , or whom you want to make love with.

By going after the same suspects we have to let the authorities find out for themselves that the perpetrators mostly come from the far and near east, or Northern Africa, and t...  Let it be.

Listen Mrs. West, Why the omission of something obvious to everybody _the fact that it was an attack against the labor party_ is such a big deal to you, I don't understand. But you're making exact the same mistake all you people of the right make. You're missing the opportunity to shut up. People killed over there were people of the left, that have been killed because some lunatic actually believed the conspiracy theories websites like this and columnists like you are spreading. Especially essays like this that are looking for paranoid “bigger pictures” behind a simple review change of some article in a newspaper in America, made him think he should act and start killing those enemies of the superior western culture. You probably see this massacre as a kind of collateral damage to an essential war. So be it. But real soldiers of honor try to limit collateral damage as much as possible, and they do recognize and regret the damage. Some however, like you, try to blame it on something else. That is of course better then the loads of rightist cowards that try to blame it on those that have been killed.  

Yours sincerly,

Peter Vanderheyden