France in NATO: Why It Matters
From the desk of Soeren Kern on Wed, 2009-03-25 12:42
Although in practical
terms full French membership in NATO will have only a slight impact on the
alliance in the immediate future, the symbolism of the move is enormous: In
what is arguably the most significant change in French foreign policy in nearly
50 years, Sarkozy is shifting his country’s famously independent defense policy
in a decidedly Atlanticist direction. By doing so, he is sending the message
that France is strategically
aligned with the United
States.
Sarkozy’s plan to reintegrate
France fully into NATO’s
military command reverses a decision made by President Charles de Gaulle in
1966, when he withdrew France
from the Alliance’s command structure in order
to preserve France’s
strategic independence from the United
States. Sarkozy says that that position,
which has remained an article of faith for French elites of all political
stripes for more than four decades, is now outdated.
In a hard-hitting
speech at the École Militaire in Paris on March 11, Sarkozy argued that France’s full return to NATO was
long overdue. “Our strategic thinking can’t remain frozen when the world around
us has completely changed,” he said, adding: “The world has changed and we must
change with it.” He dismissed as “lies” accusations from his political enemies
that he was betraying de Gaulle’s legacy and sacrificing French independence to
the United States.
“A nation alone is a
nation with no influence,” he said of France’s self-imposed exile from NATO’s
military command. He also said it was logical that France, which is the fourth-biggest
provider of troops and money to NATO, should reinforce its growing influence in
NATO by retaking its place in the integrated military command structure that
plans and conducts operations.
“We don’t have a
single military post of responsibility. We don’t have our say when the Allies
define the military objectives and means for the operations in which we
participate,” Sarkozy said. “In concluding this process, France will be stronger and more
influential. Why? Because those who are absent are always wrong. Because France
must co-direct, rather than submit.”
Indeed, Sarkozy’s main
argument for rejoining NATO is that, given its current level of engagement, France
must have a voice at the top in order to defend its own interests. In recent
years, France has gradually rejoined
the political and operational elements of the Alliance; it now sits on 36 of NATO’s 38
committees. But it has remained absent from the permanent military command
structure, which means that it does not participate in the strategic planning
that goes into operational deployments. Sarkozy says this must change.
But Sarkozy also has
other motives for reaching out to NATO. Full membership of the Alliance
will, for example, enhance French military interoperability with the United States
and other NATO allies, thereby contributing to the badly needed modernization
of French forces. Moreover, Sarkozy hopes that full NATO membership will
provide the French defense industry with access
to the mammoth US defense procurement market, which accounts for almost
half of global defense expenditures.
To be sure, Sarkozy
says that building an autonomous European defense capability remains an
“absolute priority.” Indeed, he believes that if France
fully rejoins NATO, he can boost ESDP by eliminating suspicions among NATO
allies that his main motivation is to build a rival to NATO and thus undermine
American influence in Europe. “Our position,
outside the military command, sustains mistrust about the object of our
European ambition,” Sarkozy said, but then adding: “A France taking its full place in NATO would be an
alliance that would be giving a greater place to Europe.”
To achieve this end,
Sarkozy knows that he especially needs to be able to convince Britain of the genuineness of his
pro-Atlanticist leanings. Britain,
of course, is central to building a credible European defense capability, but
up until now, it has resisted closer European defense cooperation because of
its deep distrust of French motives. Sarkozy seems to be making a bet that Britain
will no longer have suspicions about a country that is a fully fledged member
of NATO.
Most observers,
however, say that a credible European defense capability remains a distant
dream. One problem is the lack of money: Most European countries do
not even meet NATO’s recommended defense spending level of 2 percent of
GDP. Another problem involves lack of will: France’s decade-old plan for creating
a deployable European force of 60,000, for example, has never come close to
being realized. In this context, Sarkozy may have concluded that, for the
foreseeable future at least, NATO offers the only serious structure to
guarantee European security.
Sarkozy has won some
important concessions from the United States,
one of them being that Washington drop its
opposition to ESDP as a quid pro quo for France’s rejoining NATO. At the 45th
Munich Security Conference in February, US Vice President Joe Biden
declared that America would
“warmly welcome” France’s
full return to NATO and added that “we also support the further strengthening
of European defense” and an “increased role for the European Union in
preserving peace and security.”
The Americans have
also given in to Sarkozy’s demands for a more prominent French role in the Alliance. French Prime
Minister Francois Fillon said that France
would take over leadership of Allied Command
Transformation, a key NATO command post in Norfolk, Virginia,
where the alliance’s long-term strategy is discussed. France will also lead the Allied Joint Command Lisbon, which is
responsible for NATO’s Rapid Reaction Force and its satellite reconnaissance
system.
But France’s return to NATO also has the potential
to increase tensions with the United States
and other NATO members like Britain.
For example, French Defense Minister Hervé Morin says that France
rejects a global role for NATO and that the Alliance should remain Eurocentric. He also
says that Russia
should be consulted before the alliance expands any further. Those positions
could put France on a
collision course with the White House, which has bigger plans for NATO and has
criticized France and Germany for their deference to Russia on questions of European
security.
Meanwhile, NATO allies
have managed to avoid the first major spat with Sarkozy by giving in to his
demands for a top table seat in front of the television cameras for
celebrations marking the 60th anniversary of the Alliance, which will be held on April 3-4. Sarkozy,
who had threatened to boycott the event in case his demands were not met, is
expected to use the occasion to officially announce France’s
full return to the Alliance.
An abridged version was published
by World
Politics Review on March 20, 2009
Soeren Kern is Senior Fellow for
Transatlantic Relations at the Madrid-based Grupo
de Estudios Estratégicos / Strategic Studies Group
Sceptic
Submitted by marcfrans on Wed, 2009-03-25 18:16.
Count me among those "pro-Nato skeptics" who see this as part of a plan to "destroy the alliance from within", in the specific sense of "undermine American influence in Europe", which is of course also the aim of the alliance's original enemy (and reason-for-being), i.e Russia. It is not in the interest of France today that the alliance be formally disbanded, but it is in its interest to maintain access to US military know-how and to help direct US efforts in the defense of Europe. Hence, Sarkozy's move makes sense (from France's perspective) and illustrates that he is cunning and smart....
@ Frank Lee
I am afraid that you are too optimistic from an American isolationist perspective. This French move is not about "getting the US out of NATO", but rather about gaining influence for France and co-directing American efforts (deterrence through military presence) to defend Europe.
However, all of this may be moot because of two likely developments: (a) the rest-of-the-world is going to claim much more of America's attention than Europe in the foreseeable future, and (b) the US 'body politic' is probably entering a much more isolationist phase (despite temporary Obamania at home and abroad).
Let France take over European defense
Submitted by Frank Lee on Wed, 2009-03-25 15:34.
This sounds like an important step toward getting the United States out of NATO. As an American, I'm delighted to hear it.