Europe’s Anti-Discrimination Madness Goes On and On and On...
From the desk of Tiberge on Fri, 2008-05-30 09:47
This communiqué from Jean-Marie Le Pen summarizes another directive from the European Union on "multiple discrimination". This post can be added to my two recent posts on anti-discrimination measures taken by the EU:
Scarcely had the French Parliament transposed [into the French Constitution] three directives from the EU on the fight against discrimination, than the European Parliament adopted a resolution calling on the European Commission to decree a new directive, this one against all discrimination, direct and indirect, and adding to its catalogue the designation of "multiple discrimination."
But at the same time it justifies the discrimination known as "affirmative action", disguised as "positive action", and insists that it be put into general use.
This totalitarian document, that defies the most elementary distinctions, requires a special legislation, multiplies the potential for punishment and lawsuits, and gives an exorbitant role to the anti-racist and ethnic lobbies.
It goes so far as to claim that different treatment based on nationality or language can constitute indirect racial or ethnic discrimination.
The French citizens must know the extent of anti-discrimination madness, conceived as an instrument for the destruction of nations and of the most legitimate differences. They will have an opportunity to express their refusal of this intolerable dictatorship during the next European elections.
French readers can turn to Yves Daoudal for extended excerpts of the new directive. English-language readers suffering from profound insomnia can read the whole thing here. Here are a few excerpts to whet your appetite:
The European parliament, […] whereas the inconsistent application of non-discrimination policies in Member States contributes to the lack of implementation in practice of Community directives prohibiting discrimination, as is reflected in reports such as that of the European Group of Experts on Combating Sexual Orientation Discrimination entitled "Combating sexual orientation discrimination in employment: legislation in fifteen EU member states", […]
16. Urges the Member States to promote more effectively the application of the rights of EU citizens under Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, and urges the Commission, the Member States, trade unions, employers, as well as governmental and non-governmental stakeholders to do all in their power to improve awareness of rights under those Directives and to ensure that victims of discrimination have access to a range of advocacy support to enable them effective to exercise their rights thereunder; notes that the burden is often on the victim to challenge the alleged perpetrator of the discrimination, frequently with neither support from any public authority nor access to legal aid; urges Member States to empower concerned independent bodies to provide effective help to victims of discrimination;
17. Is concerned about the low level of awareness of anti-discrimination legislation among citizens in the Member States and calls on the Commission, the Member States, trade unions and employers to step up their efforts to raise that level of awareness; recalls that the Directives impose an obligation on Member States to disseminate information to the public on the relevant provisions of the Directives by all appropriate means;
18. Recommends that Member States undertake independent reviews of preventive and restitutive anti-discriminatory measures and the effectiveness of protection against victimisation and ensure that statutory and non-statutory bodies that participate in the prevention of discrimination and that support the victims of discrimination are adequately resourced; recommends also that the Commission include peer reviews in its ongoing monitoring exercise;
22. Stresses that in any event Member States should ensure that victims of discrimination are automatically assisted in legal proceedings, if necessary by public funding through legal aid schemes;
23. Calls upon the Commission practically and effectively to support the adoption of measures by Member States through the Progress programme and the European Social Fund in order to support programmes promoting equal opportunities and the eradication of discrimination;
24. Recommends that, in order to provide a more effective level of protection, Member States should empower associations, organisations and other legal entities to engage in legal proceedings, including on behalf or in support of any victim;
30. Welcomes the Commission's interest in multiple discrimination, including its launch of a study on this subject; calls on the Commission to adopt a balanced broad concept of multiple discrimination and for the Commission to examine and supply data on multiple discrimination and hate crimes; calls on the Commission to include provisions explicitly designed to combat multiple discrimination in any future legislation adopted under Article 13 of the EC Treaty, which can be invoked on either one or a combination of more than one of the grounds;
31. Stresses the importance of networking between groups active in combating discrimination at European, national, regional and local level;
34. Stresses that the Commission must produce a common, EU-wide definition of, or at least work towards a consensus about, the meaning of positive action, thereby dispelling the myths surrounding its meaning and its application in some Member States, particularly given its effectiveness for successfully tackling discrimination and producing equality of outcomes in some Member States;
"Positive action" is what Americans call "affirmative action". Note also the term "equality of outcomes", a totally fallacious and evil attempt to make everyone "equal".
39. Is firmly convinced that in combating discrimination, a holistic approach to raising public awareness must be developed, beginning with school programmes;
41. Takes the view that differences in treatment based on nationality or language, which are neither objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim nor achieved by appropriate and necessary means, may constitute indirect discrimination on the grounds of racial or ethnic origin contrary to Directive 2000/43/EC;
42. Considers that discrimination must also be seen as interfering with the four fundamental freedoms – particularly the freedom of movement for persons – and as such constitutes an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market; calls on the Commission to encourage the Member States to review their transitional provisions regulating access to their labour markets in order to eliminate differentiation between European citizens in this respect;
43. Considers that minority communities, and in particular the Roma community, need specific social protection, since their problems of exploitation, discrimination and exclusion have become even more acute in the areas of education, health, housing, employment and women's rights following recent enlargements of the European Union;
And it goes on and on and on...
See also:
Europe Defines Heterosexuality. The Politics of Appearances and Madness, 20 May 2008
@kappert
Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Sun, 2008-06-01 20:13.
Ain't the feminist movement a wonderful thing?
http://www.rootly.com/topics/world/Al_Qaeda_faces_gender_debate/
@ onecent
Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Sun, 2008-06-01 12:44.
Quote from the CWASU website:
"CWASU has never been afraid of exploring complexity, of admitting that there are gaps in (its) theory...".
Isn't it a pity that Kappert doesn't practice a similar philosophy?
@kappert
Submitted by onecent on Sat, 2008-05-31 22:56.
Thanks for clarifying, like it matters and we give a damn. In the Muslim world women are chattel, second class citizens, perpetual victims, forever treated in the historic manner that the big creep, Mohammed, treated the women around him.
You are a fool if you don't think that in large parts of the Muslim world women aren't severely punished for not being virgins.
Women are pathetic victims in the macho male universe of the Death Cult.
@onecent
Submitted by kappert on Sun, 2008-06-01 12:09.
Have a look at www.cwasu.org
Vergin(g) on the ridiculous
Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Sat, 2008-05-31 13:06.
@ kappert
Q: Does Islam demand that a female be a virgin before she marries for the first time?
Q: What is the traditional punishment for that female if it is discovered she is not a virgin?
virgins2
Submitted by kappert on Sat, 2008-05-31 12:36.
Islam does not demand the bride to be a virgin. Muslims can, if they want, marry a divorced man/woman or a father/mother.
@ kappert
Submitted by traveller on Sun, 2008-06-01 15:54.
Islam asks a widow to wait for 9 months before remarrying. It comes down to the same rule.
9 months after the death of the first husband that is.
EU madness
Submitted by realitydenied on Sat, 2008-05-31 02:35.
That is amazing. The elites are determined to destroy Europe.
Virgins
Submitted by traveller on Sat, 2008-05-31 09:15.
Can the women go to court in France for the same reason?
In France, Muslim men can now annul their marriages
Submitted by Rob the Ugly American on Fri, 2008-05-30 19:52.
if they discover their wives aren't virgins. Isn't sharia wonderful?
http://rjjago.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/french-court-annuls-muslims-marri...
Equal Protection
Submitted by Amsterdamsky on Fri, 2008-05-30 18:28.
""Positive action" is what Americans call "affirmative action". Note also the term "equality of outcomes", a totally fallacious and evil attempt to make everyone "equal"."
As in the US this violates equal protection and in the US is blatently unconstitutional. Face it. Africans have an average IQ in the 80's for the most part. As has been shown in the US no amount of special handouts will make them perform on par with other americans/europeans.