Dutch Have to Show “Basic Concepts” to Westerners Too

A quote from AKI, 16 May 2008

The Netherlands should abolish the overseas “integration test” that targets migrants of certain nationalities, according to an international rights group. Human Rights Watch said people of Moroccan and Turkish origin had been particularly hard hit by the test while citizens from western countries like Canada, Australia and Japan were exempt. […]

“The overseas integration test is discriminatory because it explicitly applies only to relatives from predominantly ‘non-western countries,’” said Holly Cartner, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. […] Under this integration test, applicants must demonstrate basic knowledge of the Dutch language and basic concepts of Dutch society before they enter the Netherlands.

 
A quote from Paul Belien at The Brussels Journal, 16 March 2006

Since 1 March people who want to settle in the Netherlands are required to pass a preliminary exam at the Dutch embassy in their native country. This so-called “integration test” includes a film which exposes the would-be immigrants to scenes of kissing homosexual men and topless women. The message is that “If you can’t tolerate gay lifestyle and public nudity, you can’t come.”

Citizens from EU member states and from Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Japan are exempt from the test. Fortunately this applies to the United States, too. Otherwise Americans – most of whom do not approve of the public display of depravity and nudity – would not be allowed to settle in the Netherlands.

freedom of speech # 3

@ logicalman

I know that you were trying to point out the presence of double standards in the world, and the lack of fairness.  And I know that there are many justified reasons for being "cynical". 

Yet, by muddling up this trivial 'incident' with the issue of "freedom of speech", you are in essence undermining the broader necessity for understanding of the need for freedom of speech.  In a similar way, many leftists and even European 'conservatives' on this blog regularly distort the meaning of "freedom of speech" and, in so doing, help to  undermine it further.

Relevant aspects of the 'incident' that you raised are: the triviality of it, the groveling attitude of apologising western politicians which undermines respect in the muslim world for the West and which strengthens muslim fundamentalist beliefs of cultural 'superiority', etc...

We do not promote freedom of speech by cynically confusing it with triviality and with silly ACTIONS (Bush and the soldier) and with NONactions (nonapologies by muslims).

freedom of speech # 2

@ logicalman

 

What are you trying to say? 

Nothing in your citation has anything to do with "freedom of speech".  Neither the (foolish) action of the American soldier, nor the (short-sighted) apology of Bush (assuming there was such an apology), nor the absence of any 'Iraqi' apologies for foolish actions by Iraqis...  And no, no Iraqi soldiers are protected IN IRAQ by the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

Logicalman should aim to be "logical" (and better informed). 

@marcfrans

I was being cynical.

In the US, shooting the Bible would cause a "blah" of course. No one would pay attention to it, except possible complain about the noise, if done in urban area.

In Iraq, shooting the Bible is legal fun, as I imagine. They even shoot kafir, don't they.

freedom of speech

US President George W Bush has made a personal apology over the
shooting of a Koran by an American soldier, Iraq's government has said
in a statement.

 

Now if an Iraqi soldier shoots the Bible, he's protected by US constitution re freedom of speech. 

re: Speare shaker's Age

There are more things in heaven and earth, kappert,

Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

 

 

Nice try but (still) no cigar. Try again.

 

 

The cave of spears

It is surprising isn't it? 'The cave of spears' is inhabited by white blond males, and the reindeer hunters are in Europe. I wonder whether traveller referred to his holidays in Scotland?

@ kappert

You see, we are not that unfair, except we did it a little bit earlier, like 14/15000 years, until our asses froze off.

@ traveller

I see that, not for the first time, we are both thinking along the same lines. So, I'm happy to let kappert ignore my question, and answer yours instead. Either way, I think it more than  likely that he will hoist himself by his own petard. It's become a kappert trademark, and it's what kappert does best.

@ Human Rights Watch

Why is it that I never, never read about your complaints against India, China, Vietnam, North Korea?

Why do you never openly attack those regimes? They don't respect any human rights. Attacking the Netherlands for a highly questionable transgression is ludicrous in the face of the massive and continuous breaches of HR by those countries and there is absolutely no question about it, there is continuous torture, rape and corruption by the whole political and judicial system in those countries.

Oh yes, there is some other country you attack also continuously: the US. Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib are your preferred topics.

Both situations are regrettable but they are addressed by the judicial system of the US and they will be solved entirely. I for one know the Arab general judiciary system and what happened in Baghdad is peanuts compared to what happens every day in every Arab and Irani jail. Why do you never protest those practices?

Guantanamo was the right temporary solution as defense against a new type of enemy and the US was right to take its time and study what to do about it.

 

In short HRW you are a bunch of leftist profiteers as usual.

From the MSNBC

From the MSNBC article:

«"As of today, immigrants wishing to settle in the Netherlands for, in particular, the purposes of marrying or forming a relationship will be required to take the civic integration examination abroad," the Immigration Ministry said in a statement.»

Precisely. If right to family life does not come in play, enjoyment of which right granted by ECHR, without being unlawfully discriminated against, does HRW claim to be violated? That claim just looks radical.

This, however:

«A censored version with no homosexual and nude material had been prepared because it is illegal to show such images in Iran and some other countries, filmmaker Walter Goverde said.»

seems wrong, if for no other reason, then because what goes on inside embassies must be subject to international treaties - not the rules on which images can or can not be shown in Iran.

"right to immigration"?

Advertising homosexuality and public nudity is regretful, but otherwise I'm with the Dutch on this one. Thankfully, there is not yet any "right to immigrate" in the treaties HRW lists, and Article 14. of ECHR (non-discrimination) has no independent standing. So if the Dutch are within current decisions of the Strasbourg activist court when it comes to right to family life, they should be just fine trying to pick among those wanting to immigrate and to weed out those ill prepared to assimilate. The measure requiring to learn a bit about Netherlands before going there to live is not an unreasonable one, and Dutch government must be competent enough to decide just which groups of suitors it wants to exempt.

If anything, the EU's well intended rules, which mandate that family members of EU nationals ought to be exempted from all integration requirements, need to be done away with.

re: why?

Why do you think that the Nigerians, Angolans, Saudis, Kuwaitis, Malaysians etc., haven't insisted that this should happen? 

Discrimination is Discernment

Lest we forget, to discriminate means to use judgment, to act with discernment, to make intelligent choices. What is being demanded is that there be a lack of judgment, a lack of intelligent choices as to whom to admit and whom to deny. How very foolish! We usually ask our governments to do a good job, but then if they try we castigate them for doing so! What fools we are!

why?

Capacity to adopt other cultures, of course.

@ kappert

Culture from those countries? Which ones? Give one example please. The African countries you mentioned don't even have a written language. Their culture is a thieving and robbing culture.
Kuwait, what culture please? Gold smuggling? Slave trading? The only people with a culture in Kuwait are the expats from Iran, India and Europe.
Just one example should do it.

@traveller

Are you denying culture to the 'third world'? If we want foreigners to live like natives, we should apply that to every country. That would be as logic as it will not work as well. After all, we will have to take it as it comes. Any selection turns out to be very difficult. We may foster our predilections, but we cano not avoid the influx of more people, due to world-wide demographics. Anyway, I agree with the integration test, that 'applicants must demonstrate basic knowledge of the Dutch/country language and basic concepts of Dutch/country society before they enter the Netherlands/country.' Sounds fair.

@ kappert

And I will get my stone-pointed spear and my moth eaten loin cloth to integrate myself in their culture, fair is fair.

likewise

Dutch emigrants, I mean those who spent a few years working abroad at Shell plants, should pass the same test - in Nigeria, Angola, Saudi-Arabia, Kuwait, Malaysia, etc.

The Death of Holland

Guess they won't be showing them any cartoons anytime soon.  I really thought things were improving but now I am planning on leaving.