The Wilders Controversy: Do Europeans Still Belong in Europe?


While America is focused on its elections, which might bring the first Muslim-born president in the White House, Europe is anxiously awaiting Geert Wilders’ movie on the Koran. The Dutch government fears that the release of the movie might lead to terror attacks on the Netherlands or on Dutch citizens abroad. There are rumours that the government may seek to ban the film. NATO secretary general Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, a Dutchman, has also expressed concern about the Wilders movie. On Sunday he told Dutch television that he fears retaliations against Dutch NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Last week Wilders complained that the Dutch authorities are putting him under pressure not to release his 10-minute film. Yesterday, a poll showed that the governing Dutch Christian-Democrats of Prime Minister Jan-Peter Balkenende are losing popularity because of their attempts to tone Wilders down. Dutch public opinion, however, tends to be very volatile. Two month ago, I wrote here that “if the Wilders movie results in (fatal) attacks on Dutch citizens and Dutch interests abroad, it might lead to an anti-Wilders backlash. The Dutch are not Danes. They have a history of swinging from one extreme to another. Like the Spanish after the Madrid bombings they might paint their hands white and surrender.”

There is little doubt that Muslim radicals are already preparing ‘punishment’ for the Dutch if they deem the Wilders movie to be ‘blasphemous.’ Westerners do not seem to have a clue about what Muslims consider to be blasphemous. The mere depiction of Muhammad enrages Muslims, even if Wilders were to do it ‘in a respectful way.’ On the other hand, however, things that seem outrageous to Westerners will not at all be outrageous to Muslims. Wilders likes to point out that the Koran is “as intolerant and dangerous as Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.” If his movie shows praying Muslims next to marching Nazis, or if it compares Koran verses to anti-Semitic rants by Hitler, that may seem outrageous to Western eyes. However, a Nazi comparison, which is the worst form of libel in contemporary Holland and destroys a man’s reputation there, will hardly affect Muslim radicals who tend to agree with Hitler and who will in all likelihood take the comparison as a compliment rather than an insult.

Al-Qaeda is not going to blow The Hague to Kingdom Come for comparing Osama bin-Laden to Adolf Hitler, but they will be inclined to take revenge over a cartoon, a picture or a joke. Suppose Wilders’ movie is outrageous by our standards, but not by those of Muslim extremists. Hence, nothing happens after the release of the movie. Then Dutch public opinion will in all likelihood regard Wilders as the extremist, as someone who tries to provoke others with Nazi slurs, and the Muslim radicals as paragons of tolerance.

Obviously, Westerners – and especially elected officials such as Geert Wilders – should never be forced to take the sensitivities of other cultures into account when making public statements (be it in a film or otherwise) in their own countries. The fact that Wilders is under considerable pressure to do just that shows that the Netherlands is no longer his home country and that it has already been penetrated and colonized by another culture. There is no place anymore that Europeans can call their own.

NATO secretary general Jaap de Hoop Scheffer is right to worry about the repercussions of the Wilders movie for Dutch soldiers in Afghanistan because it can be argued that Afghanistan is a Muslim country where the Dutch do not belong. But if the Dutch do not belong in Afghanistan, do Muslims belong in the Netherlands? If Muslims do belong in the Netherlands, then the Dutch, including Mr Wilders, should take Muslims sensitivities into account. If not, they needn’t.

If Mr Wilders were a wiser man he would have focused on the question whether Muslims belong in the Netherlands rather than on whether or not the Koran is an intolerant book. Now, by antagonizing Islam, he is putting his own life at stake as well as that of millions of his compatriots, while if he had campaigned as an advocate of deportation of Muslims his liberal compatriots might have called him a “white supremacist” or a “racist,” but they would not have had to fear for their own lives.

 
The Netherlands are not the only country where Europeans might start wondering whether they can still call their country their own.

In neighbouring Belgium, it was revealed earlier this week that for several years the Sûreté de l'Etat, the state security services, had Abdelkader Belliraj on their payroll as an informer. Belliray, a 51-year old Moroccan-born Belgian citizen, was arrested two weeks ago in Morocco for terrorist activities. Last week Belliraj, who was with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan in 2001, confessed to the Moroccan police that he committed six murders in Belgium between 1986 and 1989, including the assassination of Abdullah el-Ahdi, the imam of the Brussels mosque, in March 1989 and that of Joseph Wybran, the president of the Belgian Coordination Committee of Jewish Organisations, in October 1989.

Belliraj became a Belgian citizen by an act of Parliament in 2000. The only party which voted against extending Belgian citizenship to the man was the Flemish-secessionist Vlaams Blok party. Belgium has a long history of turning a blind eye to Muslim terrorism in return for immunity from attack. The Belgian authorities hope that by appeasing Islamist extremists they can avoid falling victim to them.

In France, meanwhile, four police officers were wounded last Sunday when masked youths fired shotguns at officers in Grigny, a southern suburb of Paris. About 30 people ambushed the officers after they were called to Grigny, an area where many Muslim immigrants live. Following last November’s riots, in which the police was also shot at, a French judge warned that France must prepare for civil war. During the November riots, French president Sarkozy announced that “those who shoot at officials will face court for attempted murder.” To date, however, only seven rioters were brought to justice. None of the youths had to stand trial for attempted murder. The longest sentence given was a 12-month term. Following the recent shooting the French authorities have again announced that those who shoot at the police will be severely punished. Does anyone still believes them? Do the French authorities still consider France to be the country of the French? Or does the “House of War” has to prepare for the unthinkable – war?

Just Who is it we Have Become so Afraid of?

My opinion is that this man, Wlder, is right to bring this sticky issue to the table, and why not, have we become so afraid of these Muslims 'sensitivities' that we now seek to avoid discussion at our own peril? Nonsense, have we forgotten who we are and the continent we have built over the centuries? We are Europeans for Gods sake, THEY came to live here as their own society was deficient in granting them their wishes, whatever they may have been, and now we have the tail wagging the dog? Let this film be released and damn the consequences, as there are laws to protect the rights of citizens, even those of us who are legitimate Europeans.

to saharian

I completly agree.
Many muslims in europe who don't want to integrate european societies and don't share our values should be deported...And it would probably need a kind of war.
Actually a soft invasion of western europe is going on with the demographic weapon.
And KOSOVO is a relevant case of what could happen more and more if we don't care in many european areas

In Reply to Thomas Landen RE: "The Wilders Controversy"

Landen: Obviously, Westerners...should never be forced to take the sensitivities of other cultures into account when making public statements...in their own countries.

Agreed.

Landen: There is no place anymore that Europeans can call their own.

Wrong. Europe belongs to Europeans, pure and simple. And if a vicious and protracted struggle is needed in order to drive the point home, than so be it.

Landen: ...do Muslims belong in the Netherlands? If Muslims do belong in the Netherlands, then the Dutch, including Mr Wilders, should take Muslims sensitivities into account. If not, they needn’t.

 

Obviously then Mr. Wilders is not obliged to consider Islamic sensitivities. On the contrary, it is in the Dutch interest to make Muslims feel as unwelcome as possible.

 

Landen: If Mr Wilders were a wiser man he would have focused on the question whether Muslims belong in the Netherlands rather than on whether or not the Koran is an intolerant book.

 

Such provocations encourage Muslims to express themselves.

 

Landen: Now, by antagonizing Islam, he is putting his own life at stake as well as that of millions of his compatriots, while if he had campaigned as an advocate of deportation of Muslims his liberal compatriots might have called him a “white supremacist” or a “racist,” but they would not have had to fear for their own lives.

 

So Muslims would not be concerned if Mr. Wilders attempted to repatriate them and sever their access to the Dutch welfare state?

@ Armor

"Western troops are doing a police job in Afghanistan and trying to organize the country in a more acceptable way because it is the home of the Taliban,who foment violence against white people worldwide...Besides,Western troops have increased Afghans' liberties".

 

That's not the argument you were peddling elsewhere.(See: Europe's Future: Prescription for Disaster).

 

"Before...forcing democracy down the throats of Middle-Easterners,I think the priority (for the British) should be to reestablish a measure of democracy (in Britain)...Just call back the army from Iraq...".

 

NB Britain has troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

 

How is this apologia re: Western 'interference' in Afghanistan materially different to what Western troops are doing in Iraq?

 

Name ONE white nation which has been invaded by the Taliban.

 

The Taliban "foment violence" against non-whites too.(Their fellow Afghanis for example).Is that OK with you? Do you care?

 

Not all Western troops in Afghanistan are white.Should they be removed?

 

What are your views on Gurkha involvement in these theatres of war? 

In reply to Atlantist119

Whether we agree or not with the protracted presence of American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, I was only saying that it is something very different from the deliberate replacement of the European population by immigrants.

The Taliban did not invade any western country but they organized or helped organize deadly attacks like 9/11. Osama bin Laden was a host of the Taliban and they had several al-Qaeda terrorist training camps inside Afghanistan.

"The Taliban "foment violence" against non-whites too.(Their fellow Afghanis for example).Is that OK with you? Do you care? "

I don't care as much when they do the killing in their own countries. I don't know why muslims cause mischief everywhere, but when they do it in Europe or America, chances are it is partially motivated by racial animus.

"Not all Western troops in Afghanistan are white.Should they be removed?
What are your views on Gurkha involvement in these theatres of war? "

I don't care about that. I don't think the Afghan(i)s like us at all, and for that reason, I don't like them either. If Bush insists on keeping troops in Afghanistan, I wish at least he would ask them to spread some herbicide on the poppy fields.

movies

I rather think he made the right choice. By putting the book in question, he reached the whole world, while the true message remains for anyone who thinks twice (which is as you name it the political issue).
Maybe he should address both topics more, agreed. And also I wonder why he didn't make the movie any longer.

Anyway whatever the consequences of this movie, I believe the support for him will keep growing.

By the way, it's fantastic, that even now when no tv station dears to broadcast it, it will be seen anyway thanks to the internet.
Only 10 years ago this wouldn't be possible (if you remember smallband)

@ Armor

I am not asking Wilders to bow to Muslim immigrants. I am only saying that I fear that if his movie leads to violence Dutch public opinion will turn against him (and against other critics of Islam). I am not saying that I agree with this.

Of course Mr Wilders has a right to say about the Koran whatever he wants. I am almost certain that I agree with his opinion about the Koran. I do think, however, that it would have been wiser for a politician not to get involved in theological issues such as the content and the meaning of Koran verses. He should instead have addressed the political issue, i.e. whether or not Muslims belong in his country and, if not, how to restrict their number.

Muslim clerics issue fatwahs against those who mock or even merely depict Muhammad or insult the Koran, but not against those who advocate the deportation of radical Muslims from Europe. If Muslims consider the Wilders movie to be "blasphemous", then every Dutchman in the Muslim world risks being killed and Dutch cities become the target of terror attacks. Advocating the deportation of Muslims from the Netherlands, however, is not blasphemy. It will upset the leftist establisment and the mainstream media (MSM) in Holland, in the rest of Europe and America, but not Osama bin-Laden. The people who are responsible for the multicultural mess we are in today are the leftist establishment and the MSM in the West. Wilders had better made a movie about how they have subverted their own country and how to remedy that situation.

Obama

It only just occurred to me that a President Obama might be good for the United States precisely because of his Islamic roots.  If civil war breaks out in France or the Netherlands, an American president sympathetic to Islam might be less inclined to send American troops to assist the Europeans.  As an American, I hope so anyway.

Obama the left and the jihad

F.Lee confirm here that Hussein OUBAMA should be a disaster for USA and that HE CAN'T be elected and i think he will not.
American troops would be welcomed in Europe if necessary and they could stay for a long time as in IRAK.

Hussein Obama is funded and supported by many islamists(Rezko,Farrakahn...)

european cowardice

You mean that dutch are cowards who lost their culture like many WESTERN europeans and that western europe is an empty place which is more and more filled by the most proselyte ,prolific and agressive people....I agree and find those "liberal" europeans despicable.

But we have to go furthermore to make a good diagnosis on the causes of that phenomenon...

Why did WESTERN europe lose its values?I have some ideas on the mater.

One can notice that the picture is not the same in EASTERN europe and USA where Obama is not elected and i think he will not be because of hese multiple links with islam

Do we still belong in Europe

In reply to Th.Landen

"it can be argued that Afghanistan is a Muslim country where the Dutch do not belong. "

Western troops are doing a police job in Afghanistan and trying to organize the country in a more acceptable way because it is the home of the Taliban, who are fomenting violence against white people worldwide. But there is no intention to stay in Afghanistan and replace the local population. Besides, Western troops have increased Afghans' liberties.

"do Muslims belong in the Netherlands?"

of course they don't.

"by antagonizing Islam, he is putting his own life at stake as well as that of millions of his compatriots"

I don't think millions will die as a result of Wilders' movie. In fact, it will be very useful to have a little violence now from the muslim nuts, because it will help stop the policy of replacing the Dutch with Arabs, and it will avoid much more violence against Whites in the close future. By denouncing Wilders, you make yourself an accomplice of the violence that will be directed against your children in the near future.

"Obviously, Westerners – and especially elected officials such as Geert Wilders – should never be forced to take the sensitivities of other cultures into account when making public statements (be it in a film or otherwise) in their own countries. The fact that Wilders is under considerable pressure to do just that shows that the Netherlands is no longer his home country and that it has already been penetrated and colonized by another culture. There is no place anymore that Europeans can call their own. "

You are the one asking Wilders to bow to the muslim immigrants! Obviously, the whites are becoming foreigners in their own countries. This is especially visible in the streets, where we can feel the physical intimidation. Europeans tend to hide in their appartments and regroup in safe places, while third-worlders tend to dominate street life, even when they are still a minority. We can also feel the intellectual influence of immigrants: TV programs get coarser and the school curriculum is dumbed down. But, for now, what kills public intellectual life in the West is the intolerant domination of the left rather than the muslim invasion. Even when it comes to islam and immigration, it is European leftists who prevent us from denouncing it.