Referring to Hitler's 1938 prohibition is mere hyperbole and of little use to any proper debate on homeschooling in Germany or elsewhere. What is of consequence is research conducted by Moore and Moore, and Taylor, which indicate that homeschooling is in fact far superior to public education. Indeed, homeschooling appears to substantially improve academic performance and foster more healthier socialization and self-actualization for its recipients.

Certainly, there is the spectre that "extreme" or "radical" elements and individuals will indoctrinate their children with "anti-social" nonsense. However, for this reason homeschooling is subject to government regulation to ensure that such curricula are in keeping with those of public schools, especially where mathematics, languages and the sciences are concerned. The spectre has political philosophical roots and cannot seem to be exorcised by appeals to testing, and thus must be ignored by policymakers. If these technocrats are elites that know better than the citizens they supposedly serve, then they of all people should not be moved by hysterical and baseless considerations.

As a product of private, public and homeschooled education, I can safely say that in all areas outside of mathematics, science and to a small degree languages, I owe a great deal to homeschooling and my own private endeavors. As far as my peers who relied solely on one another's idiocy and public education are concerned, I feel as if surrounded by a lost generation.

i'd like to be able to say that I have never had anything against the Bretons butI once dated a Breton girl (Rennes) for a number of months so I can honestly say that I have had something against at least one of them. I wonder if she was  a relative of Armor's.

;-)) 

Actually I quite like Breton's ( and , do not tell anyone , the French ) , so they would be most welcome in my corner of the U.K.

It is also true that we now have the worst government in the last 150 years and Gordon Brown is a traitor of the very worst kind , a man with no sense of honour . 

"The word racist has no precise meaning".Really?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/racist

Perhaps you'd care to sleep on it.

Well? ( A simple YES or NO will suffice).

re: another thing

Diddums! (Ain't history a bitch?).

@ Armor

Do you agree with my statement @  Reality check # 2 ?

" I wish to make it clear that I do not consider all Bretons who immigrate to the UK to be undesirables. If I did,that would be racist wouldn't it? "

Thank you. I don't consider you as undesirable either. However, I think you need to be reminded that you are the immigrant living in my country. My ancestors had to leave Britain due to a pesky invasion of Anglo-Saxons.
Now, be nice to me, or I'll have to lodge a complaint at the UN and regain possession of Britain, old country of my forefathers, birthplace of the Breton nation.

Where did I accuse the undemocratic monstrosity that is the EU for Britain's failure to leave the undemocratic monstrosity that is the EU? I simply stated the fact that the UK would be better off out of the undemocratic monstrosity that is the EU than to remain inside the undemocratic monstrosity that is the EU... 

Who is the undemocratic monstrosity that won't let the English get out of the EU ?

(hint: it begins with the letters "brit..." ; it ends up with the letters "...vment" ; and it certainly isn't the EU government).

I wish to make it clear that I do not consider all Bretons who immigrate to the UK to be undesirables.If I did,that would be racist wouldn't it?

If the British government were to repatriate every undesirable African,Pakistani and Breton tomorrow morning (and somehow managed to lick itself into shape to the degree that even Armor considered it to be a 'true democracy'),the EU would remain the undemocratic monstrosity it has always been,and the UK would still be better off out of it than in. 

I think the problem is leftism and immigration, not the EU. What is destroying England is immigration from Africa and Pakistan, not from other European countries. If you think immigration from France and Poland is a problem, it is up to the government in London to put a stop to it. After all, the EU is not supposed to be an organization dedicated to increasing immigration between member states. You probably think that the EEC/EU was a bad thing from the start. I think it was a good idea. In many fields, it makes sense to have a common policy and take decisions at the European level. However, something went wrong in the EU recently. It has become a leftist anti-European instrument. It now supports mass immigration, gay rights, the entry of Turkey, a list of "fundamental rights" drawn up by a committee of unknown leftists... Most of those things should be decided at the local or national level, not in Brussels.

I agree that there is something wrong with the EU. However, the British government has been affected by the leftist disease for longer than the EU. The immigration disaster and the stupid welfare policy are entirely of the British government's making. Your administration doesn't need France, Germany and the EU in order to destroy Britain.

I think the main reason you criticize the EU is because you are afraid to criticize London's crazy immigration policy. But the real problem is not the EU, it is your government, which is NOT A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT, and has way way way more power than the EU over Britain.

We , of the Allies , thought that we had won WW.2 , how wrong we are .

The E.U. , controlled by Germany  and "Vichy" France , now control the whole of Europe , fulfilling Hitler's dream of a Europe of " one people " , "one state". Not bad eh! , not a shot fired and with the willing surrender of the leaders of the others states .