Society of No Values

From the desk of The Brussels Journal on Mon, 2008-02-18 13:36

A quote from Reuters, 13 February 2008

A woman in Germany who became pregnant after an online sex auction has won a court battle to force the Web site that hosted the sale to reveal the names of the winners, so she can find out who's the father. Six different men won Internet auctions to have sex with the woman in April and May last year. They were only known to her by their online names, a spokesman for a court in the southwestern city of Stuttgart said Wednesday.

"The woman wanted to discover which one of the men had made her pregnant," the spokesman said. […] The woman asked the site's operator to reveal the true identity of the men, but it refused, citing a confidentiality clause in its terms and conditions.

The court ruled in her favor, saying the child's right to know who its father was took precedence.

 
H/T Nancy Morgan

A contract is a contract

Submitted by ciccio on Thu, 2008-02-21 04:27.

This whore agreed to have sex for a certain amount of money, since
she initiated the deal one must assume she was aware of the risks. Since the court seems to have agreed with her convoluted reasoning, I should ask this court to judge my suit against the lottery, I bought a ticket and did not win. The reasoning is exactly the same.

@ pashley

Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Tue, 2008-02-19 10:52.

"You laugh at Sharia..."

 

Personally,I laugh at the people who laugh at  the people who have grave concerns about the  problem that is, creeping Sharia.

"But the logic of secularism and the radically supreme individual may lead Sharia to be the clearly superior code,and families,legal authorities,and governments will leap to it as an anchor of order and civilization,however debased it is from what came before"

Agreed,and that is certainly no laughing matter.

it is consistent

Submitted by pashley on Tue, 2008-02-19 06:59.

in this modern morality tale, males are the beasts, at first in succumbing to the original offer, and then in avoiding their fate of paying to raise a child whose mother most certainly has no intention of introducing the child to the father.

Isn't it odd that the supposedly fertile and nuturing side of the speices has a seeming deathwish to vigorously drive males as far from the hearth as possible.

You laugh at sharia, but the Islamists, or any sane civilization, would never tolerate a worm like this turning within the heart of their civilization.    Right now Sharia must hide some of its consequences because, in many visibile instances, it looks morally inferior to the superior culture of the secular West.    But the logic of secularism and the radicially supreme individual may lead Sharia to be the clearly superior moral code, and families, legal authorities, and governments will leap to it as an anchor of order and civilization, however debased it is from what came before.

 

re: 200 lashes

Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Mon, 2008-02-18 15:51.

While I'm prepared to concede that kappert can be a tad annoying at times,200 lashes seems a little excessive,don't you think?

 

;-)

re: weird story

Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Mon, 2008-02-18 14:56.

What are you asking me for? Could it be that you doubt the veracity of the story but are too 'nice' to say so?

@ kappert

Submitted by Atlanticist911 on Mon, 2008-02-18 14:38.

"That's a weird story from beginning to the end".

 

So,are you telling me that that is how you think a Sharia court might see this case,or what?

weird story

Submitted by kappert on Mon, 2008-02-18 14:48.

I have no idea how 'law' treats this kind of prostitution. I do not even know if I understood the story: A female offers herself via net to several males, having sex with each one of them (just for fun or any benefit?) Obviously no precaution towards fertility, now she's pregnant. As she doesn't know anything about the males, she claims the divulgation of private internet users in order to find the male who (by chance) maybe called the father. What's next? Are they going to marry and live happily ever after or has the male to pay (a lot) for his sexy adventure?

e-sex business

Submitted by kappert on Mon, 2008-02-18 14:28.

"The woman asked the site's operator to reveal the true identity of the men, but it refused, citing a confidentiality clause in its terms and conditions.
The court ruled in her favor, saying the child's right to know who its father was took precedence.
The court declined to give the woman's age and nationality."

That's a weird story from the beginning to the end.