See Dick and Jane Roll in the Hay

A quote from Scotland on Sunday, 30 December 2007
 
Sex education lessons should be given to schoolchildren as young as five as part of a bid to combat soaring levels of teenage pregnancy and sexual disease, Scotland’s most senior public health doctor said last night. Dr Charles Saunders, chairman of the British Medical Association’s Scottish consultants’ committee, warned that schools were leaving the safe-sex message so late that many teenagers were already exposing themselves to avoidable risk. […]

Saunders, a consultant in public health medicine at NHS Fife, said: “It needs to start at quite an early age, because if you leave it until they are 12 it is too late because some are already experimenting. […]” Saunders added that all schools should also provide contraception to pupils. Currently contraception is on offer at a small number of schools. He said: “Particularly in rural areas, schools may well be the only way that pupils can access contraception. It may well be that as time goes on it would make sense to have emergency contraception in schools.”

The Scottish Government allows local authorities and head teachers to set their own sex education policies, provided they are deemed appropriate to the age of the child and parents are happy with the subject matter. In the majority of cases children do not learn about sex until Primary Six or Seven, when they are 10 or 11. They are not taught about the dangers of sexually transmitted diseases until secondary school.

A school could introduce sex education in Primary One, provided parents and teachers agreed it was the right move. […] However, a spokesman for the Catholic Church said five-year-olds were too young to understand sex. He said: “[…] It’s way over their heads and would be as pointless as giving a five-year-old a talk on alcohol.”

See also:

AIDS Prevention among Schoolchildren, 1 December 2005

Sarkastic? #2

@ Kapitein A

 

So, I must assume that your comment on "labor shortage" was not a sarcastic one.  If so, it is a faulty one. 

There cannot be a labor shortage if markets are allowed to operate, i.e. allowed to 'clear'.   "Below-replacement fertility rates and a declining population" do not fundamentally change the picture. They will induce adjustments on all sides of the market, e,g, they will lead to more capital subsitituting for labor, they will raise wages at the lower-end of the skills-range and thus attract some 'new' labor into the market (many possibilities), the higher wages will also help to restrain demand for that kind of labor, etc....

It is somewhat disconcerting how the ideological discourse in much of western media seems to be undermining common sense and to be fostering a lack of understanding of how markets operate.  How else could one 'explain' a number of the current ruling dogmas, e.g. nonsensical beliefs in the (net) beneficial economic effects of unskilled or low-skilled immigrants, in the acclamation for so-called 'fair trade' proposals by trade unions, in blaming the rich world for the poverty of the poor world, and other economic nonsense...?  

In Reply to marcfrans

marcfrans: There cannot be a shortage of low-skilled labor, if (labor) markets are allowed to operate.  Such "shortages", if they do appear to exist, are artificially created by government policies (like minimum wage laws, welfare provisions, etc...).  This is even more so, in cases where immigration laws are not enforced so that local labor markets (at the lower end of the skills-scale) are effectively 'merged' with the world market.

 

Such shortages can also be caused by below-replacement fertility rates and a declining population. Moreover, Western populations and governments are so far unwilling to allow the price of labor to rise as was the case after the Black Death. Moreover, people are also required to fill moderate and high-skill positions...

 

marcfrans: I am sure that you realise that there is no "shortage", but rather a massive surplus, of "low-skills" at the world level.

 

Obviously.

Sarcastic?

@ Kapitein Andre

There cannot be a shortage of low-skilled labor, if (labor) markets are allowed to operate.  Such "shortages", if they do appear to exist, are artificially created by government policies (like minimum wage laws, welfare provisions, etc...).  This is even more so, in cases where immigration laws are not enforced so that local labor markets (at the lower end of the skills-scale) are effectively 'merged' with the world market.  I am sure that you realise that there is no "shortage", but rather a massive surplus, of "low-skills" at the world level.

The question remains, do you really believe what you write, or is it meant sarcastically?

In Response

Scotland On Sunday: Sex education lessons should be given to schoolchildren as young as five as part of a bid to combat soaring levels of teenage pregnancy and sexual disease, Scotland's most senior public health doctor said last night.

If Saunders and his ilk succeed, from where is Scotland to derive its low-skilled labor base?

Scotland On Sunday: Scotland's sexual health record is one of the poorest in the western world. Teenage pregnancies are on the rise with 9,040 in 2005, the latest year for which figures are available, compared with 8,891 in 2004. Cases of sexually transmitted diseases are also rising. In April to June this year, Scottish laboratories saw 4,715 cases of chlamydia – up 6% from 4,468 in January to March.

How is this "poor"? Increasing pregnancy rates are accompanied by increasing contractions of sexually transmitted infections, which, though unfortunate, are not surprising. It is amusing that Scotland's "sexual health record" is taken in the context of the "western world", which suffers from apalling fertility rates. Perhaps fertility rates should take precedence over STIs and teenage pregnancies when determining the grade on a country's sexual report card.

The Leftist intelligentsia has feverishly worked for decades to dismantle those values and institutions that ensured the provision of a socio-economic structure to support pregnancies: marriage. Naturally I am overlooking the numerous other positive aspects of marriage, as well as the negative ones. However, this unrelenting assault on Western value systems, albeit hypocritical and flawed ones, has led to unprotected teenage sex being saviour rather than sin. If authoritarian rule ever rears its ugly head in the West again, one might hope that our "virtuous dictator" takes it upon himself to send the tanks, APCs and bulldozers to the liberal arts departments of our academic institutions.