"The Left is the NSDAP........it has exactly the same tactics used to out Jews, to boycott Jewish business, to urge removal of Jewish teachers, lawyers, doctors, academics. It is so interesting that the Weimar Era can be replayed so readily while people navel-gaze at the historical figure of Adolf Hitler and immerse themselves in PC versions of Nazi Germany in school history courses.................and yet history is repeating itself before their eyes with Der Stuermer aka The Independent and Voelkischer Beobachter aka The Guardian - producing anti-Jewish cartoons and hounding anyone who does not fit the "European Identikit" of the EU Dogmatists.

It is amazing how it goes on just as last time, but change the angle of attack and the game can be re-run"

Actually, Jews tend to be well represented in the ranks of the political Left and do much to further the causes of political correctness and multiculturalism, even though they are nationalistic when it comes to Israel. Secondly, criticism of Israeli policy does not constitute anti-Semitism; if this were true one could argue that Americans are 'racist' towards Canada, France, and were 'racist' towards Russia and East-Central Europe. There is a great difference in the far right and the left's criticism of Israel; the former do it because Israelis are Jews, the latter because of principle. Lastly, many Jewish Leftists are also opposed to Israeli policy and are anti-Zionist themselves.

UAF are no fringe beardies either. They count Conservative leader David Cameron among their supporters - sadly but unsurprisingly. Someone ought to bother him to see if he supports this kind of intimidation.

Like the Black pundit from London, this organisation is concluding that the British National Party is no different than the NSDAP, even though if this were true, it would have been suppressed already by the government along the lines of Oswald Mosley and the BUF. Rather than a genuine accusation, this is again no more than a smear campaign. Unfortunately, Britons are frustrated by immigration (...give us your criminals and terrorists...), multiculturalism (except where the English nation is concerned), and political correctness (only where non-Whites are concerned), and will be increasingly willing to endure official condemnation of their views to protect their ancestral homeland.

After reviewing the site in more detail, I correct my opinion that this is the dirty work of unguided individuals.  It is clearly a leftist instigated smear group.  Why should this type of trash be allowed?

The United Against Fascism group and it's supporters should be on notice that proceeding in the manner which they are constitutes an attempt to bring the country under the control of communism.  If they promote and defend communism, they have no allegiance to the country and are enemies of the citizens.  Their supporters are placed on notice that promotion and support of the front group known as United Against Fascism, even if ignorant, is without defense.

The United for Communism- Oh, the United Against Fascism group- calls for:

"Those artists - and everyone else - who defend the BNP should tell us if they defend the full reality of its politics: claims of ignorance are no defence."

If claims of ignorance are no defense, then the author of the article is without arms. 

This is merely an example of the front groups that spring up to do dirty work for the left.  Usually, as  it appears to be in this instance, the dirt workers are ignorant peons in the service of the left.  Usually, the left has supervision by someone more experienced which give these groups more polish and appeal.  Due to the shoddy and grade schoolish site of the UAF site, it may only be by a delusional individual or group infused with leftist zeal but without resources of the leftist structure.

The hachet jobs that the institutionilized leftists do are much more professional.  They are more like the one conducted by the black lady in one of the other articles on this subject. 

...But the liberal left only tolerates those who agree with them....anyone else is a rascist, homophobe, xenophobe, Islamophobe or any other kind of "hate mongering" phobe you want to come up with......Stick to your guns, Ms. Clarke!.....And keep on dancing.....

Tolerance implies allowing a standpoint one disagrees with while respecting the person in involved. After all, how could we tolerate someone unless we disagree with him? We don't need to tolerate people whose views we share because they are on our side. Tolerance is expressed for those we think are not correct, yet we treat in a decent manner and with respect!