I ran across an article which relates to some of our posts, and which places our concerns in a context.  I think this is what we all fear and we are facing unless present reality is changed.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2006/12/5_year_countdown.html

What are we, human guinea pigs for your "New World Order"? You want a war, you got one. We have nothing to fear, for death from Gulf War Syndrome is our reality. Pay us now. Or die. I have all of the proof about Desert Storm and the use of chemical and biological warfare agents from Saddam against America and our allies. Rothschild, you will hang. Neutron bombs are being discussed right this moment. Disarm or die.

Live Free Or Die.

@ Atheling

Do you really want to 'dignify' such nonsense with a response?   People who confuse the 'central bank' (to regulate the banking system and the money suppy) with a "flat tax" (a revenue-raising mechanism for government among many mechanisms) live on a (rightwing) fantasy-planet similar to leftwing Hollywood.   

For a history lesson to all of you here, the United States was founded on the premise of no taxation without representation. "Central Banks" were to be violently opposed in our Republic, as our Founding Fathers stated. Our opposition to this led to the American Revolution which began in 1775.

So I bring up a name few heard of and those which have heard this name assume it is the stuff of conspiracies. The House of Rothschild is Al Qaida. Their ownership in one bank in the USA, MBNA, has been under investigation for some time. Why? Because this credit card issuer, MBNA, provided lines of credit to Jihadists found in New Jersey, Buffalo and Detroit, and in a smaller part, Chicago, in 2003. It is no coincidence this bank was recently sold. Sadly, this paper trail finds its way to London.

My message to the British is this, why do you wait? Are you free people or are you subjects to lands and titles you will never see nor know? Do you really want a King Charles with the scandal over Diana unresolved to this day? Who let the Jihadists into your nation? Are you not in the slightest unnerved with the presence of militant Muslims on your home soil? Do you like their presence as an "excuse" to have spy cameras throughout London? Do you care at all about "privacy" in your own home? Is this a freedom to sacrifice because you have terrorists nearby?

In America, one can be both Lutheran and Catholic. I am both, and both Churches accept me. Can this be had in Britain without war and bloodshed?

What I think the problem is for Britain and France is the lack of natural resources. A solution would be to find it within your hearts to look west to the United States and seriously consider the values of being States in our Union. You will have to earn it in warfare by joining with us to end finally this threat to civilization, the Jihadists. It would be in your best interests. Here you may own a home. Here you may start a business and be your own boss. Here you can seek the dream of wealth as a self-made Billionaire like Mark Cuban is. Can you do this in your nations? Last time I checked neither France nor Britain had property rights for its citizens. In the USA as members of a State, you would be free to pick one of 50 other States as well as our territories and own your own home. In the USA you would be free to quit your jobs and seek another. You would even be free to be homeless, if that is your desire in life.

We are free in America. We have our laws, and they are hotly debated. We accept the Patriot Act because it maintains habeaus corpus, which was suspended by Lincoln and Roosevelt. GWB has not done this. Congress won't allow it either.

Your solution, England, France, is to deal with the central banks of your states and demand economic freedoms and property rights for your people. Until you can do that, your notions of freedom are alien to Americans. We dealt the treasonous Federal Reserve a critical blow already. You will see United States Notes very soon.

God Bless America

God Bless The World 

Live Free Or Die.

PS. Putin sacked Yukos. It was a monopoly. Run a search yourself to see if Yukos was influenced and/or owned by anyone named Rothschild. It might surprise you how this unholy "Lord" has made a mess of things, to say the least. We ended the USSR. But you wish to replace that with the EU? The former Russian Baltic states apply "flat taxes" as part of their freedoms as Nations. GWB supports a flat-tax. That is double-speak for saying he opposes the Federal Reserve. Is it Queen Elizabeth, or King Rothschild? Maybe it should be neither. England needs to own up for creating Communism in 1914.

I have found a French news publication with an English language blog. It is called ‘Expatica’ and it is mostly for expats who live in France, but others visit their Interactive Join a Discussion site. Most of the people live in the EU, but there are Americans living in the US who enter in. After a Paris teacher began to control the discussions, it was not as good. It was good to get the views of different people in the EU.

Ever wondered why the French dislike the Americans? Your country's hare-brained role in Suez explains so much. I could have also mentioned in my earlier comment (but I ran out of space) that Eisenhower's decision to use the UN to veto the continuance of that tripartate action (America also employed financial threats too, to ensure compliance: just call it blackmail) also resulted in Nasser being left free to offer direct support to Algeria's fight for independence, leading to the Islamification of Algeria (the FIS).

The collapse of legitimate and long established French interests in North Africa led directly to the patterns of immigration into France, Americans love to make fun of today.

Typically, American's think, ooh goody, we stuffed it to an old imperial power (France); that'll teach 'em. But, what has America become in the years since 1956 except an imperial power?? Therefore, you Americans not only fail to understand history or geography, you are also self-serving hypocrites of the first order.

Do you know how much France had invested in Algeria? Do you understand how many French (and Algerians) were murdered in cold blood to satisfy your childish desire to breed a sweet family of "free" nations, all drinking coca-cola and watching Mickey Mouse, whilst busy-bodies in New York guarantee their human rights? It is memories of Algeria that inspired Chirac (and his cronies) to treat your request for support in Iraq with the contempt it deserved.

America's attitude towards Suez was designed to humiliate Britain. And it succeeded. The degree of cynicism and contempt you engendered in British society towards you, following the events of 1956, is something most Americans remain clueless about. Then, only 12 years after stabbing us in the back (and in front of all the world's nations) you had the barefaced cheek to approach our Prime Minister, in 1968, to ask Britain to send troops to support your adventures in Vietnam! We should have said "f*ck *ff and don't come back," but our refusal was no doubt couched in rather more diplomatic language.

I am not 'blaming' America. One doesn't 'blame' a guilty party when all the evidence already points to one obvious conclusion of guilt. If you are guilty of diplomatic incompetence, as America has consistently been, then 'blame' isn't the right word at all. Stating the bleedin' obvious isn't called blame. The fact is, Americans simply cannot stand being criticised. They quickly become a crabby, touchy people whenever someone presents them with unambiguous facts that show they were wrong.

Clearly, denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

article

When mentioning the American mistakes, don’t forget the disastrous mistakes of Jimmy Carter. His blunders directly led to the current mess in the Middle East. It was Carter, who pulled the rug out from under our loyal Iranian ally, the Shah of Iran.

The Shah was deposed and replaced by the Ayatollah Khomeini. The American embassy was taken over in 1979 and Carter stood by and watched this happen. This led directly to the radicals taking power in other oil countries.

We now remain, attempting to clean- up the mess left by Carter, a person who never met a dictator he didn’t like.

About his criticism of America, Mission Impossible wrote:

"Often, the most hurtful advice can only be given by your best friends."

Let's get this straight:  we are not best friends.  We were allies of convenience throughout much of the 20th century.  Now we are stuck being your babysitters.  A friendship would have to be truly unbalanced and dysfunctional to work like the relationship between the United States and Europe does.  I, for one, do not want to be your friend.  I want you finally to take responsibility for your own national security.  The next time a crazed European leader indulges in ethnic cleansing, I want you to bomb the hell out of his country rather than demanding that we do it for you.  Perhaps at that point we can consider becoming friends.

Gentlemen, I am not anti-American. But, there is no religious edict against criticising America.

As America is a continent, I have never felt comfortable using this word. I usually want to specifically criticise or ridicule New York (++ environs) plus California, for it is these areas that harbour the attitudes that lie at the root of our ills. I don't enjoy insulting the good people of Texas, the southern states generally, and the Mid-West, when I use the generic word "America." I have visited both Texas and NY State, so I know how much they differ.

Roots of Communism & Marxism? We had this debate a short time ago, remember? We all agreed (I think) that nearly all communist & marxist luminaries were of European extraction. In other words, these theories represent a distinctly European phenomena. What we failed to agree on was what happened next. It was my contention (I used the garden centre analogy) that these movements were transplanted into the fertile soil of America, sometime between 1930 & 1945, where they were encouraged to thrive. They then shed their economic bias, and instead took on a distinctly cultural sheen. Cultural Marxism was a cake that was baked (or perfected) in America. Its recipe may not have been conceived in America, but that is where it was first served up.

What many of you missed (my fault, I didn't make it clear) was that I was focusing on the post-war years. It is these years (1945-1995) when American cultural influence was overwhelmingly decisive and influential. I contend, that much of this influence was effected through 'Soft-Hard-Left' policies. In other words, cultural ideas born of hard left thinking but delivered in soft packaging, for easy consumption. This is why I was berating America.

'Sidewinder' mentioned the Rothschilds -- we are all aware of their hidden influence. The internet already carries many websites dedicated to spreading conspiracy theories about them. But, there is no smoke without fire. Just how significant their's, and the Bilderburg group's influence is upon western affairs remains unclear to me. Whatever, most of the post-war policy errors are still stamped "Made in USA."

Example. Eisenhower's decision to pull the rug from under the feet of the British, French, and Israeli tripartate force in Suez led directly to: the nationalization of all British and French banks in Egypt, the international glorification of Nasser, the rapid expansion of Arab nationalism, the murder of Young King Faisal II of Iraq (plus his family & Foreign Minister) during a Nasser-inspired military revolution (which led to Saddam Hussein), the rise of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (started by Nasser), and the establishment of Russian influence in the Middle East.

Eisenhower & his advisers were fools. Their idealistic attempts to protect the independence of a former colony (Egypt) even though they had just stolen legally French assets, along with Washington's disdain for European power in 3rd world countries, led directly to the subsequent decline of western influence from Pakistan to North Africa. And for all your short-sighted efforts, you are now witnessing your own loss of influence after only 40 years, despite almost bankrupting yourselves whilst trying to bribe Arabs (with handouts, aid, and other generosities) so they will be nice to you.

Therefore, it is high time you accepted you screwed up, and big-time. Even Eisenhower has regretted (privately) his Suez policy. And Suez is just one example of many total failures your State Department (and CIA) has contrived over the past 50 to 60 years. Reminding you of this isn't anti-Americanism ... it is simply shocking you out of your self-induced arrogance and stupidity. I am not saying you cannot reform yourselves, but accepting there is a problem is a necessary first step.

And what about the sorry state of your leading Universities? Freedom of speech but only if you follow the leftist party line.

When I wrote: all you've given the world is multiculturalism, cultural relativism, high-rise apartments, trash television, bubblegum, Microsoft, mass 3rd world immigration, outsourcing, deindustrialization, a collapsing currency, Madonna, Islamic extremism, and all the other ills that currently plague us; part of this was supposed to be funny.

Why else would I include Madonna, bubblegum, and high-rise apartments?? I might have mentioned baseball caps worn the wrong way around! I know, British humour can be a bit strange, but we like to throw irony into the mix, just to make reality more palatable.

We know The New York Times doesn't speak for the majority of Americans, but it is still the voice we keep hearing the loudest. Until you replace such malignancy with something that better represents the real America, then you are going to suffer from association.

Often, the most hurtful advice can only be given by your best friends.

The people of Europe are not going to just sit by and turn their ass over to Islam, no way. Europeans are going to hit the panic button, and the panic button is the right-wingers. They are going to hit the panic button for one reason, and that is out of FEAR.

Armor said:

"Americans are European. By culture and mentality, no one is closer to the Americans than old world Europeans. Of course, things will be different once all of us have been replaced with Mexicans and Arabs."

Clearly, America is not a European country, as the Europeans reminds us, rudely and arrogantly, all the time.  And even if, as you say, no one is closer to the Americans than old world Europeans, that does not necessarily justify our membership in NATO or other military alliances.  Clearly, Ireland, Sweden, and France are North Atlantic nations, but they are not members of NATO (not REAL members, in France's case).  Clearly, France is a European nation and no one is closer to the French than Western Europeans, yet it served France's purposes to leave the military alliance and remain only in the political alliance (whatever that means).

Armor also said:

"The American government has been organizing mass immigration from third-world countries for about 40 years in spite of American public opinion. That's why you are now a minority in American elementary schools. American judges and the American media are not interested in public opinion either."

That's an interesting point, but I'm not sure I can agree that the U.S. government has "organized" the mass immigration.  It just happens.  And, true, the U.S. government has not resorted (often) to draconian measures to stop it, but I'm not sure that public opinion, when it really comes down to it, supports such measures.  The goofy legislation that does pass -- such as the law calling for a fence to be built along the Mexican border -- is largely ineffective and therefore symbolic, and that seems to placate everyone.

They are the ones who created the Progressives who stole our economic freedom in America called the Federal Reserve System. They are not Jews, but atheists. They use the Jews of Israel to finance their wars for profit. They want to create a War of Religions in the manner of the apocolyptic World War Two. They are AL QAIDA. Sept 11 ended their evil reign in America. They have a fierce new enemy, the United States Military. God Damn Rothschild. God Bless The World.

Live Free Or Die.

Thanks Vanishing America and Mission Impossible for your comments.  I couldn't have heard from better than the two of you as you always have insightful comments.

 If you haven't read the link in my post on Conservative Thought, you would probably appreciate doing so.  I haven't explored that site very much since discovering it, but it seems to have some very good articles.  Here is a link to another one that seems appro for this column:

  http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/11/when_killing_is_enough_to_defe.html

Keep in touch.

Unless we were prepared to run Iraq as Saddam did, or Adolf would have, we should not have gone in. According to the amnation site, platoons now operate with an embedded human rights lawyer.The mindset of those that actually made the decision to invade believed in the tenet of multiculturalism - all cultures are the same as the democratic civilised West, remove Saddam and it will turn into happy clappy Araby-On-Thames.

They were wrong about that, and given that two differing variants of Islam cannot get on, even more wrong about liberal/decadent Europe's ability to peacefully co-exist with tooled up 7th Century sand dwelling puritans.

The tragedy is that the real war was over in less than a month. If we had pulled out immediately (or ruled a la Saddam) we would now posess a big stick to wave at a nuclear weapons pursuing Iran insted of a floppy stick with a bloodstained white rag on the end of it.

This is something we will come to regret deeply, although not perhaps as deeply as Messr's Blair and Bush who will associate arachnaphobia with more than just a fear of spiders.

We have been here before. in the 1920's Germany we had communists on the left, Nazis on the right and an inneffectual, decadent Weimar Republic in the middle, presiding over economic breakdown.

Economic breakdown in the west is guaranteed by the incoherence of a pyramid based welfare state and declining birth rates. We will end up with an Islamo/leftist coalition on the left, the BNP et al on the right, and a bleating, twisting, catastrophe management Liberal/labour/conservative middle ground.

What happens after that will probably follow much the same line. Whichever side wins, the losers will be the new Jews of the 20's 30's and early 40's.

"Not sure how you define "whites", but to me it looks highly likely you have a category error here: "Muslim" is not a skin colour and "white" is not usually a religion.

What proportion of Muslims do you think are prepared to "die for their cause", if the "cause" is taken to be establishment of the Caliphate or somesuch?"

Dear Mr Doney

You are quite correct to pick me up on my definition of white and  Muslim. Some would see this as a quite astonishing example of a small minded, yet curiously endearing lack of intelligence but they are probably educated adults and as such are unable to relate to anally fixated adolescents who evade the bigger picture in favour of immaterial observations regarding the less important aspects of our survival. I do apologise on their behalf, and of course on mine, for not elaborating sufficiently in my previous post.

By "white" when writing about Europe, I do of course mean the native, indigenous populations of that particular continental land mass. I could of course break it down further into Celtic, Jewish, Saxon, etc etc, but in order to preserve my sanity, I had, mistakenly as it now appears, taken it as read that most people would understand the gist of the statement, and therefore chose to use one word rather than ten.

I quite agree with your other prescient observation that "Muslim" is not a skin colour. If you substitute the word Muslim with people of Arabic or Southern Asian descent with an adherence to a belief system centered around the writings of a 7th century Arab of military ambitious leanings you could safely assume that they are the very people I write of apropos wishing to cut off the heads of white people in Europe. 

As regards the proportion of brown skinned people of Arabic descent who are prepared to die for their cause I fear I am venturing into your own territory of pernicketiness here. No useful survey has been done in Europe regarding this but a cursory glance at Iraq should prove that whatever the proportion is, or is not, it appears to work. Suicide bombers are causing carnage and we are going to come home as a result.

I do trust that this answers your all important questions and wish you the very best in your career, which I assume you will be taking up just as soon as you finish your studies in whichever branch of micro economics you are assidiously stretching your mind with at the moment. 

My guess would be that Europe goes the road of "Eurabia." Europeans are
like Maximus's army in Gladiator - fat and bored. They don't have
children anymore, because its hip to stay single and live "sambo" your
whole life. No one has a work ethic, or a drive to fight for anything,
because the concepts of personal responsibility and individualism have
been eroded by the concept of "the state." We've all met those children
who have grown up completely coddled their entire lives by rich, doting
parents. They can't tie their own shoe by the time they are 30. They
become so used to having everything done for them, they either forget
how to do it themselves, or they never learn in the first place. That's
Europe.

Plus, and as the pundits above mention (while seemingly
ignoring the implications), the only people who might stand up and
fight for Europe will be the Fascists and racists. The debate seems to
be centered around whether it will or will not be too late to save
Europe by the time the Fascists go Holocaust on the new Muslims. But
does it matter? If the "new" Europe will be a Fasicst one, then Europe
is as equally lost. Again, I need to read Mark Steyn's book "America
Alone." From what I understand, it predicts America will be alone in
fighting for decency, democracy, and common goodness. I don't doubt it.
The age of political correctness has engulfed Europe. There is no
longer a right or wrong, just relativity. Murder is no longer plain
wrong, it "depends on the circumstances" (i.e. the murderer had a tough
childhood and just needs counseling). Rape is no longer plain wrong, it
also "depends on the circumstances" (i.e. he was abused as a child, you
wouldn't understand). Bullshit. It's wrong either way. Rape and murder
are wrong. The rule of law is right. Totalitarianism is wrong,
democracy is right. The subjugation of women and "non-believers" is not
a "cultural difference" relative to "where you live," it's wrong.

If Europe cannot find its voice, and can only be saved by the Fascists, then it is already lost.

More at PFB.

The direction Europe takes might be based upon the vote of the Muslim immigrants. They pay little or no taxes, but they draw heavily upon ‘social services.’ The left is interested in the public having more social services and high taxes don’t worry them.

The last election in Belgium showed that the Muslim vote allowed the Left to have more votes with an informal alliance with the minority Muslims. This is a natural meeting of two groups to each get what they want. The left has more power and the Muslims are part of a stronger political group.

I take your point that the 55/45 ratio applies only to French cities, but bear in mind that 50 years ago that would have been 99/1 and that 1 in 3 children born in France today are Muslim.

The reality of the situation in Europe is that whites are dying out demographically, spiritually and morally whilst the Muslims are expanding, becoming more radical and are prepared to die for their cause - their stated cause - of overthrowing the West.

At some point, probably circa 2025 the inevitable outcome of this is war, a war that our armies will be poweless to resist as it will consist of machetes in the streets. We would lose such a war.

Guilliame Faye thinks the West will only truly awake when the cataclysms in which it finds itself engulfed mean that we will be fighting not to contain, but to survive.

If this is not to come to pass it is because either history no longer applies to us, or our liberal elites remove islam from Europe within the next ten years. Neither applies.

The inevitable is inevitable, so please do not tell me stay calm.

What many of us neglect to see in the USA-Europe connection is that the left IS organized and cooperating.  That is why we face common problems.  They care nothing for nationalism and consider it an impediment to their objective of a monocultural world, which they are establishing through multicultural indoctrination.  That is why we non-leftists are split. Our national and regional identities are important to us, which is good, but are also being used as a tool to keep us divided.  They own and control the media in both locations and give us messages in each location that they wish for us to hear to keep us disorganized and divided while constantly promoting one culture for all of us, one market for the companies they control and centralized leadership for them insulated from all of us, the people of formerly free countries.

Many in both the USA and in Europe are lost to the leftist indoctrination.  Many are redeemable, but the message won't get through to them until they have had sufficient changes in their comfort levels and some relief from the relentless propoganda of the left.

Regardless of the rhetoric, most of us know that we share the same basic values and once had the same freedoms.  We see both being threatened, but it is not Europeans threatening the USA nor the Americans threatening Europe.  It is the left threatening and succeeding against both of us, just more drastically so in Europe.  They will continue to threaten our cohesion and security so long as they are in control of communications and economics.

All you people need to do is deal with the Rothschilds and the central bankers. The Rothschilds are not true Jews. Call them atheists, which they are, and this ends any issues of "anti-semitism". There is a massive movement underway in the United States concerning the Rothschild/Rockefeller connection. For anyone wondering about the status of the Union here, it is rock-solid. The Federal Reserve System ended September 11, 2001. That day was the beginning of the second American Revolution. Think I jest? Check out what is new in the USA for 2006: $50 Gold Buffalo 24K gold coins now available for the first time in our history. www.usmint.gov

Richard B. Cheney is the greatest American patriot, along with President George W Bush, since 1775 and General Washington.

I agree with Flanders Fields that conservatives don't usually hate Europe; the only 'conservatives' who do are Neocons, for whom the Iraq War is the main issue, and they feel that Europe, especially France, has let us down in the 'War on Terror.'
Many of those who dislike Europe claim to do so because the Europeans are leftists and appeasers, who lack the backbone to deal with the Islamic threat within. Yet the neocons are the ones who refuse to halt Moslem immigration into our country, and who in fact support mass immigration. Of course they especially favor Mexican immigration (which is a greater immediate danger to us) but they also seem to believe that most Moslems in America are 'moderates' and no threat.
The whole trend of bashing Europe is a recent thing in American history; it's only become fashionable in the last decade or so in my experience. Our forefathers may have been more isolationist than America is now, but I don't recall the antipathy towards Europeans that I see now. To me, it's cutting off our nose to spite our face. We can't pretend that Europe is not connected to us, and as they go, so go we.
We have a huge problem with appeasement of our own internal threats, so we have little basis to criticize 'Eurabia'.
And yes, Ralph Peters is not to be taken seriously; he is all over the map on the Islamic issue.

I am sorry but Ralph Peters has lost his mind. He attacks any of us in the States who might have a few reservations about the whole Religion of Peace claim. 1,400 of history is apparently not enough to convince him.

Pierre Legrand

The Pink Flamingo Bar

I endorse Armor's lack of alarm over the splitting of America from her former Western European allies, at least militarily.  Important security matters -- such as detering domestic terrorism, most obviously -- can still be the focus of much cooperation if NATO splits apart, just as America and Sweden on the one hand, and America and Ireland on the other, have cooperated for decades on fighting international crime despite having no military alliance between them.  We make a big mistake in assuming there is a permanent or even close bond between America and Western Europe.  The two most important religious identities in Europe today -- atheism and Islam -- have left no deep footprint on American culture.  Elite opinion directs public opinion in Europe, whereas public opinion determines elite action in America (for good or ill).  As more Muslims immigrate to Europe, the two groups will become even more unalike.  We Americans would be wise to cute the ties now before things get any uglier -- and stop sobbing about it.  This could be a divorce made in heave (for us, anyway).

the various welfare states in Europe continue to "pay out" the goodies they promised, not a whole heckuva lot will happen.

Threaten those goodies however, and watch out.

For example, witness the student riots in France last year. Or on a lesser scale of intensity, the protests in Germany and Italy.

If European Muslims are perceived as a threat to the trough of "free money", they will not enjoy the consequences. I have seen newspaper reports in the Scandinavian countries the effect that Muslims cost far more money than they are worth. I have no reason to believe that these stories are not - or will not - make the news elsewhere in Europe.

Paul, here is an example of Conservative thought.  I think Europe could have used this long before, but is already past that point.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/11/how_we_will_lose_our_freedom_o.html

c

Paul, dll2000 is correct that there is a difference between "conservatives" and Conservatives, especially in the US.  I am not disputing whether the professor you mention was indeed conservative or not.  I'm saying that many who are called by that name are not, and I think that is what dll meant, also.  Especially, the neo-con label seems to be what we Conservatives would call liberal at best and leftist or communist.  Worse, we would probably label them as DEMOCRAT!  We know that the media in particular like to set liberal people or groups up as being moderate or conservative so they can show how balanced they are in reporting on them or show the negative sides of issues that really are conservative by inarticulate spokesmen.

The conservatives who do not have a voice of significance in the mainstream media are the true conservatives.  Whether they have voices in the media or not, they are the ones who are the everyday people you will meet, and usually not professors, educators or heads of corporations.  You will know they are conservative because they are working for a living, taking care of their family and kids, and doing what they can to survive in a world that has gone topsy-turvy and is increasingly threatening their families and the culture they were born into and enjoyed.

You may not recognize them right away, but you will after time.  I think you will come to love and respect them, even if they cite no degrees after their name, or participate in any conferences.

They want to live their lives and be left alone.  They want to enjoy their country, the fruits of their own labor, and to share with the needy(starting with the ones in their own backyard).  They want to wear what they choose and respect those people who respect them.  Conservatives do not like those who attack them or their country, including those who do that who are from their country.  They want to say what they choose to say, go where they choose to go(within their means), and are not afraid to tell you where to go if you interfere with those rights.

If you want to meet conservatives in the US of A, get out on the streets, the roads, the small towns and meet the people (who are the REAL people).  They don't always carry it on their chests and many are confused about what they really are and vote for the wrong people and wrong reasons, but these are the true conservatives.  They are almost always freindly unless you give them reason not to be, so don't be afraid to talk to them.  They are the backbone of America and just a little down in the back right now.

"While visiting the US recently I met a conservative professor who told me almost literally the same thing as Peters. He, too, said that Europeans were ineradicably vicious, that hating others is in their blood and that they can never be cured of their mass-murdering impulse. He, too, said that, rather than taking native European immigrants in, America should open its doors to Muslims, because those people “can at least be respected while Europeans can only be despised.” "

This almost certainly was not a conservative professor and Peters is definitely not a conservative.  At least not how conservatives in the U.S. are defined.  By the way, conservative professors in the U.S. are as rare as albino tigers.  They are systematically black balled by liberal administrations.

"I can understand why these conservatives have come to despise Europe. They despise it because it refused to assist the U.S. in Iraq and because it refuses to stand with Israel."

No, we despise Europe because they short sightedly believe that appeasement and self-dealing (Oil-for-food) will satisfy any enemy when historically it has satisfied none.  We despise them because part of their appeasement strategy is the hope that we will be attacked instead of them.  We despise them because they have put all their eggs in a socialist basket that has halted virtually all innovation on thier part for the betterment of humanity.  We despise them for their ingratitude for all the contributions in blood and treasure that we have made on thier behalf. 

Also, Israel is not the be all end all for conservatives, 87% of Jews voted for Democrats in the mid-term elections.  However conservatives understand that if Israel was destroyed tomorrow it would not appease the muslims for one day.  They would simply move on to the next grievance and continue their 1,500 year war on Western Civilization.   

Finally, we despise Europeans because they despise us.  It didnt happen overnnight, but it has happened, human nature is what it is.

Forgiveness is possible though, kind hearted people that we are.

I am not sure that "far right" groups will be the danger.  From the news misreporting and fabricating that has been happening, it is more likely that the left has turned against anyone and anything connected with Israel and jews.  Rightist groups are more interested in preservation of their homelands and I can't see that the jewish population is threatening that. Leftists and immigrants are the ones threatening the homelands of whatever nation.

At one site I recently visited but don't remember it's location, it was stated that already in France there is an equal number of native and immigrant youths.  The import of the article was similiar to yours, that the percentage of population does not indicate the point at which real problems will arise.  The youth are more active and forceful than the older inhabitants.

....will pay the price, eventually.....Don't come running to the US and A, buddy....You just may find yourself being ignored!......