arabic/north african/persian/asian non-white men are genetically inferior to european men. bottom line.
that is an upsetting statement because we all know it is true, if it wasnt, it wouldnt cause a reaction.
they fear women, all women because they are weaker physically, mentally and to their horror, sexually, especially to european women. they hate this, they fear it and this is the core reason behind the development of their oppressive and abusive 'culture' and religion. they have established laws and rules to subdue women because they are ashamed of their genetically inferior position. without these perverse laws women could easily assert their dominance over them.
blame mother nature or god, whichever, but is just a fact. the oppresive nature towards women in many asian cultures is based in the same thing.
before christianity, european women had all the same rights as men. pagan women could rule, own property, divorce at will etc. why? because we dont fear our women, or any women for that matter. we are very confident in our mental and physical genetic nature. it is just a biological fact. we are genetically superior. the nazis bringing these claims to the forefront was threatening because it was true. the japanese claimed the same genetic superiority as the nazis did but nobody was bothered by that because it was a laughable claim. if arabic men were to claim racial superiority the planet would laugh, especially european women, they know this and they hate this. the rapes are the manifestation of their anger at their inadequacy. they are a scourge to our superior society. we easily could brush them aside and end this perverse subhuman behavior, they could not stop us, but it is up to us alone. western civilization has done nothing but progress and grow. do we allow this cancer to grow amongst us? superior genes produce superior intelligence and thus culture. do we really want these weaklings assaulting our women and ruining our standard of living? they cant help that they are weaker and vile, nature cursed them, but it is not our fault, but if we allow them to continue it becomes our problem. the lion can easily swat the fly from his eye, but will he choose to do so?

    Moslem apololists like Unni Wikan should be fired from mainstream universities and only be allowed to teach in madrasses where they can continue to kiss Muslim ass. Only a raghead sycophant would blame Norwegian women for their own rapes because they dress provocatively.

   As for the rapists themselves, I wouldn't  mind seeing the loved ones of the rapists cut off the rapists dicks and shove them into the rapists' mouths, followed by a mandantory prison sentence of twenty years to life depending on the amount of violence involved.

    And if there is any confusion as to how these thugs should be treated in prison, I encourage the Norwegian authorities to contact the brave Americans in charge of Abu Ghraib. 

Where can one obtain the official Oslo rape statistics? Just need to obtain them for someone I know who only follows MSM.

I should hope that Norwegian women don't expect their brothers and fathers to fight for their honor.  Norwegian women have spent the past four decades insisting that they can be as independent as men and are in no need of special protection.  I only hope that, having talked the talk, they will now walk the walk and stand up for themselves.

For those who didn't follow the link to Norway's main newspaper "Aftenposten", please see the article here. This article was from 2001 and we know it has gone a lot worse since then...

"Oslo rape statistics shock
Two out of three charged with rape in Norway's capital are immigrants with a non-western background according to a police study. The number of rape cases is also rising steadily.The study is the first where the crime statistics have been analyzed according to ethnic origin. Of the 111 charged with rape in Oslo last year, 72 were of non-western ethnic origin, 25 are classified as Norwegian or western and 14 are listed as unknown.

Rape charges in the capital are spiraling upwards, 40 percent higher from 1999 to 2000 and up 13 percent so far this year.

Nine out of ten cases do not make it to prosecution, most of them because police do not believe the evidence is sufficient to reach a conviction.

Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen of Oslo's Vice, Robbery and Violent crime division says the statistics are surprising - the rising number of rape cases and the link to ethnic background are both clear trends. But Larsen does not want to speculate on the reasons behind the worrying developments.

While 65 percent of those charged with rape are classed as coming from a non-western background, this segment makes up only 14.3 percent of Oslo's population. Norwegian women were the victims in 80 percent of the cases, with 20 percent being women of foreign background.

Larsen said that since this was the initial study examining ethnic make-up there were no existing figures to put the numbers into context.

"Meanwhile, it is our general experience that this is an increasing tendency. We note this by the number of time we need to use interpreters in the course of an investigation," Larsen said."

As far as I know they no longer make these figures available to the public. Possibly out of fear of potential reactions. But anybody reading the papers cannot have failed to notice that the frequency of horrific gangrapes of Norwegian girls has intensified to such an extent it is hardly regarded as big news any more.

Norwegian girls don't expect their fathers and brothers to fight for their honour, they just want the freedom they once enjoyed to walk safely around the delightful city of Oslo back. Norwegian girls want a decent and non-violent people to inhabit Norway and they were never asked whether it was ok to drown Oslo in muslim immigrants. No wonder Swedish girls have started to dye their hair dark. So if we all veil up, dye our hair and lock ourselves up in our homes, we should be just fine. And many muslim men would certainly agree this would be the only sensible thing to do since muslim men cannot control their urges and women are asking for it by being out without a male escort. Perhaps we are naive, but we dont' believe the "whole" society has gone bad. Norwegians are still not committing more crime than they used to. But when asylumseekers can gangrape their caseworker and STILL be allowed to stay, you could really blame us for asking for it...

For those who didn't follow the link to Norway's main newspaper "Aftenposten", please see the article here. This article was from 2001 and we know it has gone a lot worse since then...

"Oslo rape statistics shock
Two out of three charged with rape in Norway's capital are immigrants with a non-western background according to a police study. The number of rape cases is also rising steadily.The study is the first where the crime statistics have been analyzed according to ethnic origin. Of the 111 charged with rape in Oslo last year, 72 were of non-western ethnic origin, 25 are classified as Norwegian or western and 14 are listed as unknown.

Rape charges in the capital are spiraling upwards, 40 percent higher from 1999 to 2000 and up 13 percent so far this year.

Nine out of ten cases do not make it to prosecution, most of them because police do not believe the evidence is sufficient to reach a conviction.

Police Inspector Gunnar Larsen of Oslo's Vice, Robbery and Violent crime division says the statistics are surprising - the rising number of rape cases and the link to ethnic background are both clear trends. But Larsen does not want to speculate on the reasons behind the worrying developments.

While 65 percent of those charged with rape are classed as coming from a non-western background, this segment makes up only 14.3 percent of Oslo's population. Norwegian women were the victims in 80 percent of the cases, with 20 percent being women of foreign background.

Larsen said that since this was the initial study examining ethnic make-up there were no existing figures to put the numbers into context.

"Meanwhile, it is our general experience that this is an increasing tendency. We note this by the number of time we need to use interpreters in the course of an investigation," Larsen said."

As far as I know they no longer make these figures available to the public. Possibly out of fear of potential reactions. But anybody reading the papers cannot have failed to notice that the frequency of horrific gangrapes of Norwegian girls has intensified to such an extent it is hardly regarded as big news any more.

Norwegian girls don't expect their fathers and brothers to fight for their honour, they just want the freedom they once enjoyed to walk safely around the delightful city of Oslo back. Norwegian girls want a decent and non-violent people to inhabit Norway and they were never asked whether it was ok to drown Oslo in muslim immigrants. No wonder Swedish girls have started to dye their hair dark. So if we all veil up, dye our hair and lock ourselves up in our homes, we should be just fine. And many muslim men would certainly agree this would be the only sensible thing to do since muslim men cannot control their urges and women are asking for it by being out without a male escort. Perhaps we are naive, but we dont' believe the "whole" society has gone bad. Norwegians are still not committing more crime than they used to. But when asylumseekers can gangrape their caseworker and STILL be allowed to stay, you could really blame us for asking for it...

More rape information is available from this article in American Thinker:

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2006/12/as_ye_sow_the_case_of_norway.html

 

 

It links to this article from Aftenposten:  http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article190268.ece

I would like to see more details on these rape statistics.  Just to say the numbers of rapes have risen dramatically can be misleading.  We need the complete story; who was the victim, the accused's relationship to the victim, and what constitutes rape in Denmark. 

Several years ago there was a poll that claimed that 1 in 4 American women were or would become victims of rape in their lifetimes.  But the authors of this poll characterised many things as rape, such as the 'victim' having consumed any kind of controlled substance, such as alcohol; a woman who gave into her husband's continued advances even though she didn't feel like having sex; etc. 

My guess is that many of these rapes occur between Muslim men and Muslim women.  I would not be surprised if many of the Muslim victims did not consider themselves to have been raped.  This may be labeled as such after the fact by Danish authorities, who have much more liberal views on sex and marriage than do foreign born Muslims. 

Do we actually know that this surge in rape is victimizing ethnic Norwegian women?  Isn't it more likely that the victims tend to be other Muslims--may, in fact, be women who are raped by the "husbands" their families have chosen for them from Pakistan, against their will?  If this is truly as big a problem as it sounds, and if it in fact is against ethnic Norwegian women, than I have to say that Norwegians are even more pathetically passive and self-defeating than I thought, if they've let the problem grow this bad.

What a stupid person, if you can't stop yourself from raping a woman because she shows her hair, you should go back to living in Saudi Arabia. I hear they punish rape victims there, you'll like it, scumbag.

I mean, seriously, the christians are bad enough with their moral policing, and now muslims are saying that it is the woman's fault when she is RAPED by a man? We need to do something to get these religious freaks out of the dark ages.

Repeat after me: Rape victims have NO responsibility for rape, the ONLY PERSON RESPONSIBLE IS THE PERPETRATOR.

What's next? Blaming a beheaded journalist for having such a juicy neck? "They couldn't stop themselves from beheading him after seeing that great neck. Beheading victims must take their share of responsibility for these beheadings."

It is just as absurd.

Revolution as it is normally thought about would not be necessary to change the course that the world finds itself on.  The utopians are numerically smaller and they do not have a tremendous philosophical following.  They primarily have the advantage of hiding within multi-level interconnected and interdependent structures which they themselves have built and they maintain control of their first objective, communications and media.  They have the advantage, too, of knowing that disruption in one country will result in support by others of them internationally.

 

The requirement to accomplish overthrow of the existing order is truth and the ability to communicate it without interference.  That is their main fear and they go to outlandish lengths to suppress truth and the publics ability to hear it for a sufficient time.

 

Leadership which is concerned with maintaining social order and inspires trust is necessary in addition to truthful communication.  Leftists would not hesitate to start a war to maintain their control.  They can and do control extensive military resources along with tremendous financial assets.  Thinking that overturning them in one country would be sufficient is folly.

A primary consideration is maintenance of good structures in society while preventing in fighting which might erase gains. Some of what was instituted by them has had good results and the alliance of good people. Replacing while not keeping positive values for society is short term thinking. Restoration of historic personal freedoms for individuals and their supremacy over collectivists must be the goal.

 

 

Below is an extract from an interview that Sir Richard Dannatt, the Head of the British Army, gave to Sarah Sands of The Daily Mail on 12 October 2006.

“We can't wish the Islamist challenge to our society away and I believe that the Army, both in Iraq and Afghanistan and probably wherever we go next, is fighting the foreign dimension of the challenge to our accepted way of life.

 

We need to face up to the Islamist threat, to those who act in the name of Islam and in a perverted way try to impose Islam by force on societies that do not wish it. In the Cold War, the threats to this country were about armies rolling in. Threats now are not territorial but to the values of our country.

In the Army we place a lot of store by the values we espouse. What I would hate is for the Army to be maintaining a set of values that were not reflected in our society at large — courage, loyalty, integrity, respect for others; these are critical things.

I think it is important as an Army entrusted with using lethal force that we do maintain high values and that there is a moral dimension to that and a spiritual dimension.

When I see the Islamist threat I hope it doesn't make undue progress because there is a moral and spiritual vacuum in this country. Our society has always been embedded in Christian values; once you have pulled the anchor up there is a danger that our society moves with the prevailing wind.

There is an element of the moral compass spinning. I am responsible for the Army, to make sure that its moral compass is well aligned and that we live by what we believe in.

It is said we live in a post-Christian society. I think that is a great shame. The Judaic-Christian tradition has underpinned British society. It underpins the British Army."

Dear Mr Doney

 

You do not need to trust me, with regard to a revolution. The only people capable of it are the military.

 

Back in the 70's there was a real fear that the British Communist party could come to power. In the event that they had been voted in there was a highly organised contingency plan which had been put in place by the military. I will not give the name of the General  who was tasked with organising this, but can say that every county in the country was divided up into areas, with each area coming under control of officers made up from the army, navy and air force.

When I talk of revolution, do not be misled into thinking that I exclude the military today.

For the reasons I gave earlier today, I do not believe we live in a democracy in the UK. When marcfrans states that democracy enables idividual freedom I would argue that one is only free providing one agrees with the ruling othodoxy. As we are all presumably aware, laws regarding freedom of expression have been passed which if transgressed mean re-education or imprisonment. Ergo, we no longer have individual freedom or democracy.

 

Whilst I agree that a revolution of the mind is necessary I do not believe this can happen at the present time, due to the near stranglehold the left has over the means of information. I cannot see this changing for many years and firmly believe that by the time it does, the demographic balance between whites and non-whites will have swung in favour of an ethnic block vote, thereby relegating electoral democracy to it's grave, from a white point of view.

 

This is why I am in favour of revolution. As to unintended consequences, who knows? All I can say is that whatever they may turn out to be they will be better than their alternative - sharia law.

 

The slow motion islamic coup that Europe is undergoing may be in slow motion, but time is rapidly running out if we wish to preserve what our fathers and grandfathers fought to preserve for our sake.

 

Can we vote our way out of it? I doubt it, the time for words and votes was 20-30 years ago, we were never given that option then and now it is too late.

 

 

...once in a while.

@ Weston

The point of democracy is not "elections", but the maintenance of individual freedom.  Elections are just a tool on that road, but do not guarantee that outcome.  The only "revolution" that is needed is a revolution in the minds of people.  A 'mental revolution' that frees them from the ruling orthodoxy of moral relativism and sentimentality in contemporary western media and education.  

And Doney is right too about Zimbabwe.  The notion that someone like Mugabe would care about "his own people" is very naive.  Unless you were to interpret "own people" very narrowly as his immediate cronies who will do anything to keep on the gravytrain of his being in power.  Mugabe has misused age-old tribalisms (Shona versus Matabele, as well as anti-colonialism) to gain power.  But that power, once obtained, like most other African leaders he will never voluntarily 'give up', which means that elections there have become largely irrelevant and 'unfree'.  

 

Mr Fjordmann, do you have any sources on the victims of these rapes, and whether the makeup has changed in recent years. In other words, how many are known to the perpetrators (partners, husbands, friends), how many are "white", how many are themselves Muslim? Anything like that. I only ask because in the UK most reported sex offences are perpetrated by family members or people known to the victim. This applies also to rape, and I wondered if that was also true in Norway/Oslo.

If citizens could legally carry tear gas or pepper spray, it might deter some attacks. In America, some pepper sprays have a dye to mark an attacker. Some American states have ‘concealed carry permits’ that allow them to carry a pistol. If a rapist were shot, the news would travel back to his friends. They would think twice about raping some blonde Infidel woman, if they might get shot.

I know that carrying a pistol goes against most of the conventional wisdom in Norway and the EU, but times have changed. It’s a New World in Norway now.  Why be a victim?

Weston, you must realize that there are still many tweeds who live in denial, which is why so much of this became established to begin with.  Tweeds are so open-minded that they cannot form a mental moral compass and they will invite those who are their own enemies into their own homes.  They don't realize that they endanger all their neighbors by doing so.  Their values are so relative that they are of kin to everything.  They are emasculated mongrels to intelligent thought.  Don't waste a lot of time feeding them when they bring up collateral issues of little significance.  They only disrupt serious focus.

Many are becoming aware but are overwhelmed by the magnitude and scope of the issue. They find it difficult to identify how it happened though they can open their eyes and see that it has. It is against most of what they have learned and been taught. The next generation will find it more difficult. You provide good thought.

The tools are being placed for transition from soft to a hardline.  Your speech rights are being limited, whether you consider it as aimed at you or at someone else.  The state can now enforce thought by limiting access to information as it has for many with the controlled media.  The individual is being reminded in not so subtle ways that their well being comes after the need to adapt to ways chosen by the state.  Businesses and individuals who do not comply with directives face financial burden and ruin. 

 

Many individuals who are capable of thought and resistance have chosen not to do so.  They feel they can escape by ignoring what has become obvious.  Leftist influence now faces them in their workplace, in their ability to walk safely down their street, in all social activities and every conversation they engage in which is not about sport teams or celebrities.  They cannot take a swim without checking as to whether average citizens are allowed at that day and hour.  The house you now own is truly being rented by your taxes which go in payment.

 

Some attempt to escape the problem by moving from their homes to another.  They soon find the same problems facing them there or soon will.  The individual is expendable in the search for global enlightenment.  Utopians are finally finding their utopia.  If you are one attempting escape, you had better do it by the rules and denounce your fellow citizens who attempt to resist(you will earn a mention in their publications).  Your turn will come if you dare express thoughts you learn to have.

 

We men are learning that we live in a multicultural society and that we must adapt to it.

Really, Mr Doney, you do let yourself down intellectually from time to time.

 

The right to vote in a democracy is so self evident it does not really need to be stated.

 

Zimbabwe is a case in point with regard to self destruction, but this is simply a side affect of Mugabe's desire to rid the country of whites, not his desire to deliberately ruin his own people. It is also a dictatorship in Africa and removed thereby, in my opinion, from intellectual discourse.

 

As to whether you can name hundreds of such countries I doubt very much this is the case. You appear to be overextending your capacity for discombobulation here.

 

By "us" I mean non leftists. Again, self evident I would have thought.

 

If you wish to pedantic with regard to "it would take a revolution" you have not, unless you were alive in the 19th century actually "heard" such rhetoric, although I grant that you may very well have "read" about it. In addition I think you will find that the Bolshevik revolution occurred in the 20th, not the 19th century.

 

And no, clearly I do not call for a "Bolshevik" revolution I call for a revolution from the right, not the left, or more pertinently a counterrevolution from the right to depose the slow motion, bloodless, ongoing revolution from the left that is the cause of so many ills currently affecting the West.

 

I thought my previous post was a good basis for intellectual discussion, your reply was certainly not that. Let us hope that others, if they wish, can add some informed opinion/argument rather than your usual pedantic nitpicking which as per usual ignores the main thrust of the text.

I realize that posting the following link goes beyond rape into the realm of homocide, but it's all intertwined....I may be presumptuous in my assessment, here, but what do you all bet the person(s) responsible for this fit a certain profile????.....If you know what I mean????.....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236197,00.html

 

If the rate of sexual assault in Oslo is six times higher than in New York City, and two-thirds of the rapists are immigrants, doesn't that mean that native Norwegians in Oslo are raping at a rate double the rate in New York City?  Since that is highly doubtful, we have to consider the possibility that these numbers reflect (in part) a surge in victims' willingness to report rapes, not simply a surge in rapes.

You ask if we live under democracy or a soft form of totalitarianism. From the perspective of the UK I think it is quite clear that we do indeed, as you imply, live under the latter.

 

If the ideology of the elites in the UK and the EU were compared to any previous form of governance in the last century, then it could only be that of Communism.

 

Although, at present, it is obviously not hardline, it is Socialist, an ideology described by James Burnham in his "Suicide Of The West" as merely a stepping stone to Communism proper.

 

In order to have a fully functioning democracy it is necessary to have the following ingredients:

An educated electorate.

A free press.

Freedom of speech and thought.

An apolitical police force.

An apolitical educational service.

A cohesive society.

A society independant of government largesse which votes not out of self interest, but for the overall benefit of the country.

An honest government that tells the brutal truth rather than relying on lies, evasion, propaganda and brainwashing.

A government that represents the best interests of the indigenous population.

 

As we have none of these it is clear that democracy is just a token word in the UK today.

 

Furthermore, unlike Communism in Russia, our elites actually seek to degrade our culture and institutions. This a double whammy, I do not believe that any country, in the history of mankind, has ever had to deal with an undemocratic elite that actually seeked to destroy that which it presided over.

 

When one takes into consideration that an unelected EU commission (out of which 21 commissioners, 7 are ex communists) passes 70-80% of laws in the UK and that mass immigration was never voted for by the British electorate, democracy seems further and further to be simply a mirage.

 

I think that a fairly sure sign that a country is run under totalitarian lines is when the elites that control ALL the institutions relating to the dissemination of information - eg, Schools from primary to university level, and the media, engage in a process of propaganda and brainwashing based around marxist ideology, (which over the course of the last century murdered close to 100 million people). Even worse, any resistance to the social engineering program is met with threats of "re-education" or arrest.

 

So, yes, we live under totalitarian rule.

 

As to overthrowing it via democratic means, I believe this to be impossible. The cultural revolutionaries of the 60's and 70's know exactly how they gained power at the expense of the politically naive, tweedy old buffers previously running our institutions. They will never allow us to do that to them.

 

The scale of change is simply too large to be undertaken by democratic means, especially when one considers that there is no longer an electoral majority in the UK large enough to vote for change, assuming that is, that they are even aware of the necessity.

 

An entire layer of leftists need to be removed from the civil service, the media, the educational system, local governments, social services and the police.

 

IF this was possible a subsequent revolutionary mindset needs to be accepted by the populous at large in order to do what must be done to regain their country, culture and civilisation.

 

Could this be done democratically? Of course not. It would take a revolution.

 

I rest my case.

 

 

Who is it who joins in the rape? Leftist policy invites those who have that propensity, sets them loose within our societies, gives them benefits free of work to obtain them, excuses them before any crime happens and defends them when the crime occurs.  Leftist policy also punishes those who talk about them(leftists or criminals) by making "hate laws" to restrict and deny your speech, or at least make you think seriously about the consequences to you.  They muzzle those who are said by leftists to be your only approved source for free press and have made media and news into covens for leftist viewpoint, suppression of facts and entertaining propoganda for us and our neighbors.

 

You are the ones who allow them to continue the leftism which blind all of us and tie our hands.  You know how to stop it, but you don't.  You continue your support for their little rules and meekly accept their imposition.  You are afraid to stand up and stop it since there seems to be more of them.  You prefer to blame a pretty young girl from your own neighborhood who is enjoying her life and her individuality and who is a blessing for all mankind.  You don't place the blame where it belongs.

 That is the answer...Deport these goat f-kers and while were at it, deport Unni Wikan also, with his "tolerant" view!.....Hey Unni, It's not THIER COUNTRY!!!....It's NORWAY'S!!!.....Fjordman is right, this subject is getting tiresome...especially when nothing has changed for the better.....

 

 

http://www.vdare.com/letters/tl_011904.htm

 

The above article links to the original in the Daily Telegraph. Subscription is required for the Telegraph, but the VDare article includes most of it.

 

That this was not a massive talking point in the UK is testimony to the power of speech control and media dis-interest/censorship.

 

When a black girl claimed she had been raped by Asian men in Lozells, Birmingham, riots immediately erupted on the streets. This was a one off report and was subsequently proven unfounded, yet the differing reactions between blacks and whites is startling.

 

When confronted with factual evidence of gang-rapes EVERY DAY in London, carried out in the main by blacks against whites the reactions were as follows.

 

The police tried to excuse the ethnic side of it, whilst claimimg it was irrersposible to have been printed in the first place.

 

Black spokesman/feminist spokesman said...nothing.

 

The Government said nothing.

 

The BBC and msm said and did ...nothing.

 

The whites, did nothing.

 

And so goes a civilisation, wrecked, decadent, emasculated, spoiled, uneducated, dependant, brainwashed, timid, corrupt and quite possibly utterly deserving of all it has coming to it.

 

OR, it is time, indeed overtime for counterrevolution...

 

Fjordman asks whether Islam is compatible with democracy. I would like him to write an article about whether he thinks liberalism, the consequences of liberalism, or even our very survival can be solved within a democratic framework.

 

 

 

We shouldn't forget that rape charges are only the tip of the iceberg.
Usually only a tiny fraction of rapes are declared by its victims - for shame.
Consider this and add a multitude of physical harassment and even more verbal harassment and you get the picture.
It's devastating and sick - and not just restricted to Norway...
Is the behaviour of a far too great number of today's male muslims to be accepted in our society - for the sake of the freedom of religion and equality of whatever culture?? Is the moral grounds of Westerners and Muslims really the same when it comes to condemning such acts? Sadly, in islam there are enough examples which do not inspire. Look at Mohammed and his followers. Anyone thinks that the wifes and daughters of the beheaded males of the Quraish clan were happy to "get married" to Mohammed and his followers right after the execution of their husbands/fathers?
Such shorttime "marriages" were a common thing to happen, once the Mohammedans had raided a carawan or locality...The mere conception of females as male properties which far too many Muslims adhere to and declare as part of their religion is sick. That's  why many Muslims prefer to put their daughters/wifes in sacks and females who don't walk around in a sack simply signal to them they got no owner, are "uncovered meat".

The choice is simple - Muslims have to decide to accept Western values or not.
Up to now many have decided not to. There was no need for that. Our governments kept and keep welcoming and granting social benefits to anyone, regardless of the benefit - and if at all - they contribute to our societies. 

“Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes”

Leftist idiots can be proud for having made the first step to Sharia with this sort of thinking. Just a matter of years and the rape victims will be jailed and/or harassed like in true-muslim countries.

Immigrant rape in Europe is almost always distinct from intra-European rape, because it is communitarian in nature based upon:

1. Differences in phsyical characteristics i.e. White victims, non-White perpetrators
2. Differences in religious affiliation i.e. Christian, Jewish, atheist and agnostic victims, Muslim perpetrators
3. Differences in socio-political values i.e. liberal and social democratic victims, authoritarian and theocratic perpetrators
4. Group fetishisim i.e. of fair girls, especially blondes

Thus, this rape phenomenon should be viewed by us as it is viewed by those that commit it - as a group struggle, rather than merely as a crime committed against an individual. Indeed, every rape is a political act, one that is hostile; just as terrorism is distinct from a disgruntled employee "going postal."

Evidently, we do not have the time nor space to rewrite Western legal codes, especially those pertaining to crime. However, I agree that false rape accusations should be punished, although I stand by my reprise's severity w.r.t. murder and rape. I also agree with your discriminatory measures against rape committed by foreigners and newly naturalized citizens. Outside of the Americas and Australasia, I do not believe in "naturalized" citizens, for ethnic nationalism prevails beyond those so-called melting pots which can at best grant them the status of landed immigrant.

Rather, first-degree murder, or the equivalent of murder with intent should receive an automatic death penalty, with life imprisonment (for the full duration of the person's natural life not 30 years) for second-degree murder, and 30 years for manslaughter.

 

With regards to rape:

• 10 years imprisonment for each sexual act
• 20 years imprisonment for each sexual act if it is deemed to be aggravated
• Life imprisonment for the full duration of the perpetrator's natural life if the victims number more than one
• Any charges of assault, etc., to be added on to the sentence imposed

W.r.t. early release on probation:

Reduction of up to one third of the prisoner's sentence if they are deemed to have "reformed" themselves according to a panel including representatives of the judiciary, police, government, criminology and psychiatry. "Reform" must go far beyond being a quiet prisoner...

• The agreement to wear a tracking device at all times
• The agreement for one's criminal record, personal information, and residence be publicized

W.r.t. "mitigating circumstances":

The only ones available are self-defense or defense of another, otherwise the perpetrator must take responsibility

"“Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes”"

He is right after all they are a the ones who vote in large majority for the socialist nanny multicultural pro-immigrant polits.  Maybe the answer is to have more goats in Oslo as decoys and let them roam free like they do with cows in India.

The punishment for rape should be death.